Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RockChalkJayhawk
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 192

    #1

    Tophat junctions.bed

    Has anyone seen a wierd junctions file as an output. Although most of my paired-end reads aligned to the genome (both pairs), my junctions.bed file doesn't link together many of my exons. In fact, most of the links that were made are not even between exons, rather they were intergeneic and scattered.

    This is not due to loading it onto the wrong assembly. Has anyone else had this problem with paired end reads?
  • RockChalkJayhawk
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 192

    #2
    Also, the coverage.wig looks good.

    Comment

    • RockChalkJayhawk
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 192

      #3
      See the image attached

      Here is a good example of what I'm talking about. For this gene I have a lot of coverage, but only 3 splice junctions are detected. Any ideas?
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • lifeng.tian
        Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 16

        #4
        Originally posted by RockChalkJayhawk View Post
        Here is a good example of what I'm talking about. For this gene I have a lot of coverage, but only 3 splice junctions are detected. Any ideas?
        I looked at my TopHat results for a 75nt run (18M paired-end reads, illumina GA IIx), there are 12 junctions detected in chr1:879,584-894,679 region, however, only 4 junctions have more than 5x coverage. If you have shorter reads and lower coverage than
        my data, you may see less number of junctions here.

        FYI, I detected 185,238 total junctions.

        Here is the 4 junctions from my 75nt run:
        chr1 887451 887857 JUNC00121200 40 - 887451 887857 255,0,0 2 68,66 0,340
        chr1 889202 889440 JUNC00121202 37 - 889202 889440 255,0,0 2 70,57 0,181
        chr1 891331 891529 JUNC00121205 17 - 891331 891529 255,0,0 2 62,55 0,143
        chr1 894390 894642 JUNC00121207 7 - 894390 894642 255,0,0 2 71,48 0,204

        Comment

        • john_mu
          Member
          • May 2010
          • 88

          #5
          Originally posted by RockChalkJayhawk View Post
          Has anyone seen a wierd junctions file as an output. Although most of my paired-end reads aligned to the genome (both pairs), my junctions.bed file doesn't link together many of my exons. In fact, most of the links that were made are not even between exons, rather they were intergeneic and scattered.

          This is not due to loading it onto the wrong assembly. Has anyone else had this problem with paired end reads?
          This would depend on the settings you use. SNPs in the right location could cause the junction search to fail.

          What do you mean by most? if you mean over 50% of your gene exhibit that kind of behavior despite good coverage that is a bit strange. Maybe you should try less strict settings.

          or you could give SpliceMap a try
          SpliceMap: De novo detection of splice junctions from RNA-seq
          Download SpliceMap Comment here

          Comment

          • RockChalkJayhawk
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 192

            #6
            Originally posted by john_mu View Post
            This would depend on the settings you use. SNPs in the right location could cause the junction search to fail.

            What do you mean by most? if you mean over 50% of your gene exhibit that kind of behavior despite good coverage that is a bit strange. Maybe you should try less strict settings.

            or you could give SpliceMap a try
            I thought about it, but my reads are 2x36 -- too short for SpliceMap. I'm still playing around with some of the parameters...

            Comment

            • edge
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 199

              #7
              Hi lifeng.tian,

              I'm running tophat with the following command:
              Code:
              tophat -r 110 -p 4 --solexa1.3-quals --library-type fr-unstranded -G homo_sapiens.gtf human_reference_genome s1_1.fq s1_2.fq
              OUtput file generated from tophat:
              Code:
              junctions.bed
              insertions.bed
              deletions.bed
              logs/
              accepted_hits.bam
              Based on the junctions.bed, can I know that how you group them based on the region in each chromosome?
              This is the total number of junction identify by tophat:
              Code:
              chr1    13677
              chr10   5130
              chr11   7780
              chr12   7558
              chr13   2293
              chr14   4818
              chr15   4368
              chr16   6604
              chr17   8343
              chr18   1778
              chr19   8369
              chr2    9800
              chr20   3278
              chr21   1460
              chr22   3419
              chr3    7619
              chr4    4735
              chr5    5970
              chr6    6789
              chr7    6513
              chr8    4306
              chr9    5461
              chrX    4042
              chrY    312
              What is the important to identify its coverage at this stage?
              Is it the figure in column 4 represent the coverage of each junction?
              Really thanks for any of your advice to interpret the junctions.bed shown in tophat_out.
              Many thanks in advance.

              Comment

              • arcolombo698
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2013
                • 142

                #8
                Originally posted by lifeng.tian View Post
                I looked at my TopHat results for a 75nt run (18M paired-end reads, illumina GA IIx), there are 12 junctions detected in chr1:879,584-894,679 region, however, only 4 junctions have more than 5x coverage. If you have shorter reads and lower coverage than
                my data, you may see less number of junctions here.

                FYI, I detected 185,238 total junctions.

                Here is the 4 junctions from my 75nt run:
                chr1 887451 887857 JUNC00121200 40 - 887451 887857 255,0,0 2 68,66 0,340
                chr1 889202 889440 JUNC00121202 37 - 889202 889440 255,0,0 2 70,57 0,181
                chr1 891331 891529 JUNC00121205 17 - 891331 891529 255,0,0 2 62,55 0,143
                chr1 894390 894642 JUNC00121207 7 - 894390 894642 255,0,0 2 71,48 0,204
                for this file (in response to #4) how did you calculate the total amount of junctions? is it the total amount of entries in your junctions.bed file? ie. the amount of columns in your file?

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                24 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                36 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                42 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...