Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Olioli
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 3

    #1

    cummeRbund get significantly differentially expressed genes

    Hello,

    I am conducting an RNA-Seq analysis to identify significantly differentially expressed genes (SDEGs) between 5 conditions. I followed the Tuxedo protocol which is tophat/cufflinks/cuffmerge/cuffdiff/cummeRbund (http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/...t.2012.016.pdf) and I am at the final part where I need to determine the number of SDEGs.
    I followed the cummeRbund instructions in the manual (http://compbio.mit.edu/cummeRbund/manual_2_0.html) and here's my output:
    Code:
    >cuff_data<-readCufflinks(genome="genome.fa",gtfFile="merged.gtf")
    CuffSet instance with:
    	 5 samples
    	 16011 genes
    	 36460 isoforms
    	 24184 TSS
    	 15312 CDS
    	 160110 promoters
    	 241840 splicing
    	 135440 relCDS
    >gene.diff<-diffData(genes(cuff_data))
    > sig.gene.diff<-subset(gene.diff, significant=="yes")
    > nrow(sig.gene.diff)
    [1] 4500
    > mySigGeneIds<-getSig(cuff_data,alpha=0.05,level='genes')
    > length(mySigGeneIds)
    [1] 1386
    > mySigIsoformIds<-getSig(cuff_data,alpha=0.05,level='isoforms')
    > length(mySigIsoformIds)
    [1] 900
    So when I use diffData() and filter only significant results using subset() I get a total of 4500 SDEGs (this is for all pairwise comparisons that I can extract separately using another subset() with sample names) BUT when I use the getSig() method with alpha=0.05, I only get 1386 gene IDs (not 4500), so that's less than a third from what I get with diffData. I tested at "isoform" level to see if it would match but it didn't.
    The part in the cummeRbund manual about getSig() says "a alpha value can be provided on which to filter the resulting list (the default is 0.05 to match the default of cuffdiff)."
    From what I understood, the diffData() method is supposed to just extract the information from cuffdiff without making additional tests so shouldn't I get the same number of genes?
    I would be greatful if someone could explain me clearly the difference between those two methods and which one should be used to determine SDEGs.
    Thanks a lot for your help,
    Oli
  • Olioli
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 3

    #2
    I realized that if I use the getSig() method one pair of conditions at a time with the command:
    cond1_vs_cond2_getSig<-getSig(cuff_data,x="cond1",y="cond2",alpha=0.05,level="genes")
    and sum the length of the vectors (=number of SDEGs) for the 10 possible pairwise comparisons (I have 5 conditions) I get a total of 4773 SDEGs.
    So I think that, with 5 conditions, using getSig(cuff_data,alpha=0.05,level='genes') will correct for multiple testing going through all conditions and this is why I get a smaller number of genes, so I shouldn't use it to determine SDEGs for a particular pair of conditions, can someone comfirm this?
    On the other hand I am still not sure whether I should use diffData() + filter only significant results + filter by pairwise comparisons OR if I should use getSig(cuff_data,x="cond1",y="cond2",alpha=0.05,level="genes") for each pair of conditions.
    I thank anyone who may help me with this!!
    Last edited by Olioli; 11-25-2014, 10:22 AM.

    Comment

    • Olioli
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 3

      #3
      After more than 400 views nobody answered or helped me at all,
      I am sure that someone should be able to help me on this forum, I will be glad to answer any question you may have.
      Last edited by Olioli; 01-09-2015, 05:14 AM.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...