Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adam_ie
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 3

    #1

    Enriching bacterial RNA from infection samples

    Hi all,

    I am working with RNA samples from in vitro infections of cells with bacteria. I would like to sequence the bacterial component of these samples. From a previous sequencing effort, I know that the vast majority (>99%) of the RNA comes from the host (eukaryotic) cells.

    I previously attempted to deplete the eukaryotic and prokaryotic ribosomal RNA, as well as Poly-A transcripts, to leave only bacterial non-ribosomal RNA, but this did not prove sufficient and the vast majority of the RNA is still eukaryotic. Instead, I'm now considering the opposite strategy of enriching the bacterial RNA prior to sequencing.

    From the data I have, I know that the amount of bacterial RNA that I actually want (i.e. non-ribosomal bacterial RNA) is in the range of ~1ng upwards per sample. One option that I am exploring to selectively enrich this RNA is the use of the SureSelect RNA Capture kit from Agilent (or a similar kit) using probes covering the whole genome of the bacterium.

    I'm wondering if anyone has experience with a similar approach, or with enriching bacterial RNA from mixed samples generally? Will the SureSelect kit, or a similar kit, be able to handle an input as low as 1ng if it accounts for less than 1% of the sample?

    Any thoughts or comments appreciated! Thanks
    Last edited by adam_ie; 04-09-2015, 05:49 AM.
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I previously attempted to deplete the eukaryotic and prokaryotic ribosomal RNA, as well as Poly-A transcripts, to leave only bacterial non-ribosomal RNA, but this did not prove sufficient and the vast majority of the RNA is still eukaryotic. Instead, I'm now considering the opposite strategy of enriching the bacterial RNA prior to sequencing.
    I wonder if you have used this commercial product which follows a similar approach: http://www.lifetechnologies.com/au/e...tic-hosts.html

    From the data I have, I know that the amount of bacterial RNA that I actually want (i.e. non-ribosomal bacterial RNA) is in the range of ~1ng upwards per sample. One option that I am exploring to selectively enrich this RNA is the use of the SureSelect RNA Capture kit from Agilent (or a similar kit) using probes covering the whole genome of the bacterium.
    In theory this should work as long as you have enough RNA (mix of host and microbe) equivalent to mRNA input requirement of the kit.

    Comment

    • adam_ie
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2013
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      I wonder if you have used this commercial product which follows a similar approach: http://www.lifetechnologies.com/au/e...tic-hosts.html
      Yep, that's exactly the method I tried, without success. The proportion of eurkaryotic RNA seems to just be too high, even though it was considerably depleted with the above kit.

      I'm now thinking that enrichment of the bacterial RNA is the only way to go in this case.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...