Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mfahim
    Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 11

    Problems with q-value in RNAseq

    I have four subjects (one wildtype and three mutants, no replications) at two different conditions (a total of 8 samples).. cuffdiff tells me there is no significant difference based on adjusted p-value (aka q-value).

    This is why I guess q-value is just overrated.. and is not applicable to every RNAseq analysis.

    What do you say?. I have attached expression bar plot to this post and would appreciate your comments on statistics.
    Attached Files
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    FYI, an adjusted p-value and a q-value aren't actually the same thing, though they're related.

    I have no clue how you came to the conclusion that this somehow indicates that adjusted p-values are overrated. This is a good example of how high variance in an under-powered experiment leads to insignificant results. Adjusted p-values have nothing to do with that.

    Compensating for multiple corrections is applicable to EVERY RNAseq analysis like yours.

    Comment

    • mfahim
      Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 11

      #3
      I got an excellent explanation to my querry..

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...