Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • StefanF
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 3

    #1

    gmap_build error

    Hey guys,

    I am trying to build a custom reference (mm9+ERCC spike-in) to reproduce some single cell RNA-seq results. I appended the mm9 genome (as a fasta file) with the ERCC sequences (also as fasta) and run the following command:

    Code:
    gmap_build -d mm9_ERCC92 mm9_ERCC92.fa -k 15 -D ~/stefan/scLVM/
    All goes well until:

    Building suffix array
    SACA_K called with n = 2725848238, K = 5, level 0
    /usr/local/bin/gmapindex -d mm9_ERCC92 -F /stefan//scLVM//mm9_ERCC92 -D /stefan/scLVM//mm9_ERCC92 -S failed with return code 9 at /usr/local/bin/gmap_build line 375.

    Any ideas what could be going on here?
  • Michael.Ante
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 127

    #2
    Hi Stefan,

    only a shot in the dark: did you check the fasta's window length? Try fastx-toolkit's fasta_formatter:
    Code:
    fasta_formatter -w 60 -i mm9_ERCC92.fa -o mm9_ERCC92_w60.fa
    diff -s mm9_ERCC92.fa mm9_ERCC92_w60.fa
    Cheers,
    Michael

    Comment

    • StefanF
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2015
      • 3

      #3
      Hi Michael,

      I just compared the two files and they are indeed different.

      Comment

      • Michael.Ante
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 127

        #4
        Thinking about it twice, the two files can differ and still it will not work (if the window-length is constant but not 60 nts).

        Just check the line length visually with the first ERCC-transcript (should be ERCC-00002):

        Code:
        grep -A1 -B1 ERCC-00002 mm9_ERCC92.fa

        Comment

        • StefanF
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2015
          • 3

          #5
          Okay, the ERCC sequences are shorter than 60 nts. So gmap_build can't handle that? But it should work with the the corrected file mm9_ERCC92_w60.fa?

          Edit: Alright, I get the same error with the formatted file... I really appreciate the help though. Maybe you or someone else has another idea?

          Edit 2: The error seems to be in the suffix array construction. Is it really necessary to build that or does it only slow things down later?
          Last edited by StefanF; 09-07-2015, 12:00 AM. Reason: Update

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...