Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Biomicrogen
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 6

    RNA-SEQ, Gene duplication, and gauging system regulation

    Hi All!

    So I have a few questions here:

    I am comparing gene expression between two lifestyles of a novel organism, which I have a draft annotated genome for. There appears to be several copies of many different genes distributed at various loci on the genome, this could be an assembly artifact but I'm not inclined to believe that as the genomic context around most of the duplicated genes is different.

    1) If I have several annotated "copies" of a gene which my transcripts map to, and say there is variation in the Log2 fold levels of each (some up some down, all significant) of the "copies", can I add these numbers to get an overall expression change of this one gene if I think it is a duplicate? However, perhaps this is a biologically relevant change than by doing this I would loose valuable information.

    2) Along these same lines, if I am looking at a system, say CDS involved in photosystem I, would it be biologically relevant to add all the fold changes of all genes in this system and say that Photosytem I is generally X fold ip/down regulated?? It seems a fairly straightforward assumption but perhaps I am missing somethiing?
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    1) Sure, I've used the same trick with other transcripts that happen to appear multiple times in the genome.
    2) No, that's not legit. What you're looking for there is called "pathway analysis", though it won't give you a fold enrichment (if you needed that, you might just report the median change, though that is itself not without issues).

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    9 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...