Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nk
    Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 11

    Using DESeq2's VST

    I need to normalize some RNA-seq data (read counts) to obtain library-size normalized inputs for eQTL calling. The easiest option would be to simply calculate TPMs or FPKMs (i.e. divide by the total number of reads per library) but I thought it might actually be better to use DESeq2's variance stabilizing transformation for this. If I am reading the vignette correctly, this should not only scale the read counts by a better estimate of the library size, but also log them and result in a more stable variance across mean expression levels.

    Has anybody tried this before? Is there any reason why this would not be a good idea?

    An additional complication is that I have read counts at multiple conditions. Right now I am normalizing them all at the same time, using design = ~condition to tell DESeq which condition each sample is from. Is this okay or would it be better to normalize each condition individually?

    Here is my code:

    Code:
    library(DESeq2)
    cds = DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(data.in, colData = colData, design = ~condition)
    dds = DESeq(cds)
    vsd = varianceStabilizingTransformation(dds, blind = FALSE)
    data.out = assay(vsd)
    colnames(data.out) = colnames(data.in)

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    Yesterday, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...