Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pandapiggie
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2016
    • 5

    different replicate numbers

    Dear all,

    I would like to know if it is possible to do a differential expression analysis on samples that have different replicate numbers?

    I recently received my data using illumina hi-seq for bacteria samples. I had 3 replicates per sample but when I did the alignment on bowtie2 1 sample had a replicate with only 49% alignment rate.

    Does anyone have suggestion on how to proceed? I am thinking of just doing a 3 replicate sample A vs 2 replicate sample B. Is this acceptable or should I adjust it to 2 replicates per sample?

    Thank you for your answer.

    Jason
  • ddb
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 13

    #2
    Originally posted by pandapiggie View Post
    Dear all,

    I would like to know if it is possible to do a differential expression analysis on samples that have different replicate numbers?
    Yes it is possible to do this.


    I recently received my data using illumina hi-seq for bacteria samples. I had 3 replicates per sample but when I did the alignment on bowtie2 1 sample had a replicate with only 49% alignment rate.
    I would not automatically discard this sample based on the mapping rate but would investigate the cause of the low mapping first. Possible causes are adapter sequences left on the reads preventing the mapping or sample contamination, ribosomal contamination etc. Did you do any preprocessing of the reads? You might find FastQC and FastQ Screen useful for investigating this. If you captured the unmapped reads do a blast search of some to see what hits you get.

    Does anyone have suggestion on how to proceed? I am thinking of just doing a 3 replicate sample A vs 2 replicate sample B. Is this acceptable or should I adjust it to 2 replicates per sample?
    Do not adjust to 2 replicates per sample. Keep as much data as possible.

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      @pandapiggie you may want to use bowtie v.1 (or turn off splice detection in other aligners) to see if that improves alignment (since this is bacterial data).

      There is always the possibility that that one replicate may be bad. Have you scanned/trimmed these sequences for presence of adapter?

      Comment

      • pandapiggie
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2016
        • 5

        #4
        Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
        @pandapiggie you may want to use bowtie v.1 (or turn off splice detection in other aligners) to see if that improves alignment (since this is bacterial data).

        There is always the possibility that that one replicate may be bad. Have you scanned/trimmed these sequences for presence of adapter?

        Dear GenoMax,

        Thanks for the suggestion. May I ask if I were to use bowtie v1 for that sample do I need to redo the alignment for all the other samples?

        Sorry for the beginner question.

        Comment

        • pandapiggie
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2016
          • 5

          #5
          Sorry another question pop up in this case.

          Which pipeline would be more accurate in this case? I was thinking using cufflinks but from what I understand DESeq2 is good for my case as there is uneven number of replicates between samples.

          Can anyone help me?

          Thanks

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...