Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baby1885
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 13

    Question about transcriptome

    Hello,everyone
    When i see some articles about transcriptome,I find something puzzled me is transcript type is processed transcript,unfortunately i really can't understand the "processed transcript" ,anyone who know about it can resolve it for me
    Thank you very much!!!
  • malachig
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 117

    #2
    When asking this kind of question, it would be helpful if you provided some specific examples. Post some actual quotes showing usage of that phrase and the citation of the paper you obtained the quote from.

    One common meaning of the term "processed transcript" is that the transcript is a mature mRNA molecule as opposed to an unprocessed pre-mRNA molecule. In this context a pre-mRNA is transcribed by an RNA polymerase (i.e. RNA Pol II) and is then "processed" by the splicing machinery to remove introns and connect adjacent exons. Processing could also include the addition of a 5' cap and 3' polyadenylation.

    From wikipedia (emphasis is mine):
    "A primary transcript is an RNA molecule that has not yet undergone any modification after its synthesis. For example, a precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) is a primary transcript that becomes a messenger RNA (mRNA) after processing, and a primary microRNA transcript (pri-miRNA) becomes a microRNA (miRNA) after processing."


    As you can see, the term can refer to miRNA processing as well as mRNA processing. It could also mean something else entirely, but without more context, its difficult to say.

    Comment

    • baby1885
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 13

      #3
      Thank you malachiq, I have got it!!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...