Trinity assembly and qPCR

Vinn

Member

Join Date: Nov 2014

Posts: 21
- Share
- Tweet
#1

Trinity assembly and qPCR

07-11-2016, 04:03 AM

Hi folks,

I have new RNAseq data assembled with Trinity, and now I am trying to use qPCR for validation. I blasted a gene of interest from another species against the RNAseq data for primer design, but I have got something like this in return.

comp82676_c0_seq1
comp82676_c0_seq2
comp82676_c0_seq3
comp82676_c0_seq4
comp82676_c0_seq5

All of them are best hits and have identical score and E value. They only have tiny gap differences when I aligned them.

May you explain what are diffrences between them and which one I shall use for primer design? I want a primer to amplify both gene of interest and the closest hit from the new RNAseq data.

Thank you very much for your time and help!
Tags: None

Previous template Next

Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems

by SEQadmin2

Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...
- Channel: Articles
07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival

by SEQadmin2

Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
- Channel: Articles
07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing

by GATTACAT

Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
- Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

Topics	Statistics	Last Post
UC San Diego Bioengineers Map Gene Function in Human Stem Cells by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM	0 responses 27 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
New Analysis Splits Leukemia Into 16 Epigenomic Subgroups by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM	0 responses 37 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Uncovers Unlikely Psoriasis Target by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM	0 responses 25 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
Engineered Protein Motor Takes Its First Steps Along DNA Track by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM	0 responses 35 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM

Unconfigured Ad

Trinity assembly and qPCR

Latest Articles

ad_right_rmr

News