Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • plyguy69
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 9

    Primescript Reverse Transcriptase Not Working

    We are working on single-cell RNA seq using a version of Simone Picelli modified SMARTer method. Instead of Superscript II we were using Clontech's Primerscript. Unfortunately, the latest batches/ lots have been giving huge nonspecific products around 200-300bp. We switched from Superscript II because they had a problem with bacterial RNA contamination. Is anyone out there using alternate RT enzymes for the single-cell RNA seq protocols? Any response or advise would be greatly appreciated!

    I'll try attaching our data below....

    Thanks,
    ply
    Attached Files
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I think the problem is other modifications not the RT enzyme. Your reactions has produced the large transcript drived cDNA. You can get rid of smaller fragments by bead clean up.

    Edit: RT enzyme contamination and alternatives has been discussed:

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas
    Last edited by nucacidhunter; 09-24-2016, 12:20 AM.

    Comment

    • plyguy69
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2015
      • 9

      #3
      Thanks Nucacidhunter

      Those cDNA products shown were analyzed after one SPRI bead clean up. You're right I can remove the majority of the lower bp nonspecific products by a second bead clean up (have tried and it worked). We are just concerned about these products showing up in the new lots of Primescript and don't want to rush into HiSeq runs until we know for sure what's going on....

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Looking at your negative control trace might give some idea about their origin.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        40 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        102 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        123 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        114 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...