Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shimul
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 8

    #1

    Library insert size

    Hi There,

    I am aiming to sequence bacterial genome with NexteraXT 300bp paired-end reads. I have made my library and all the fragments size (including the adapter) are ranging from 200-650 (I check with the bioanalyzer and gel). Do you think that I will have sufficient insert size in the end? Do you think that I will have good insert size for clustering on the MiSeq platform (using Nextera v3 chemistry)?

    Would be very helpful of your suggestions here!

    Cheers,

    Shimul
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Insert sizes will be around 50-500 bp and most of sequenced fragments will be from shorter inserts and their abundance will depend on size distribution of library fragments. Library should cluster and sequence fine but you will not benefit from the long reads. To sequence larger fragments library fragments should be 600-1500 bp.

    Comment

    • Shimul
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2017
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks a lot @ nucacidhunter

      Comment

      • Shimul
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2017
        • 8

        #4
        Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
        Insert sizes will be around 50-500 bp and most of sequenced fragments will be from shorter inserts and their abundance will depend on size distribution of library fragments. Library should cluster and sequence fine but you will not benefit from the long reads. To sequence larger fragments library fragments should be 600-1500 bp.
        Hello,

        I am finally running of my sample on the Miseq using MiSeq V3. I have checked the machine now and it shows that after 70 cycles, the >=Q30 is 96%, cluster passing filter 91.4%, and the cluster density is 1092K/mm.

        Do you think that the run is going well?

        Hope to hear back from you soon again!

        Cheers,

        Shimul

        Comment

        • jdk787
          josh kinman
          • Apr 2014
          • 72

          #5
          Originally posted by Shimul View Post
          Hello,

          I am finally running of my sample on the Miseq using MiSeq V3. I have checked the machine now and it shows that after 70 cycles, the >=Q30 is 96%, cluster passing filter 91.4%, and the cluster density is 1092K/mm.

          Do you think that the run is going well?

          Hope to hear back from you soon again!

          Cheers,

          Shimul
          Those numbers are good, so the run is probably going well.
          Josh Kinman

          Comment

          • Shimul
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2017
            • 8

            #6
            jdk787

            Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
            Those numbers are good, so the run is probably going well.
            Thanks a lot Josh!

            Cheers,

            Shimul

            Comment

            • HESmith
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 512

              #7
              @Shimul, it is not necessary to post the same question multiple times on the forum. Your run metrics look good.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              13 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              34 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              41 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...