Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shimul
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 8

    #1

    Library insert size

    Hi There,

    I am aiming to sequence bacterial genome with NexteraXT 300bp paired-end reads. I have made my library and all the fragments size (including the adapter) are ranging from 200-650 (I check with the bioanalyzer and gel). Do you think that I will have sufficient insert size in the end? Do you think that I will have good insert size for clustering on the MiSeq platform (using Nextera v3 chemistry)?

    Would be very helpful of your suggestions here!

    Cheers,

    Shimul
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Insert sizes will be around 50-500 bp and most of sequenced fragments will be from shorter inserts and their abundance will depend on size distribution of library fragments. Library should cluster and sequence fine but you will not benefit from the long reads. To sequence larger fragments library fragments should be 600-1500 bp.

    Comment

    • Shimul
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2017
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks a lot @ nucacidhunter

      Comment

      • Shimul
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2017
        • 8

        #4
        Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
        Insert sizes will be around 50-500 bp and most of sequenced fragments will be from shorter inserts and their abundance will depend on size distribution of library fragments. Library should cluster and sequence fine but you will not benefit from the long reads. To sequence larger fragments library fragments should be 600-1500 bp.
        Hello,

        I am finally running of my sample on the Miseq using MiSeq V3. I have checked the machine now and it shows that after 70 cycles, the >=Q30 is 96%, cluster passing filter 91.4%, and the cluster density is 1092K/mm.

        Do you think that the run is going well?

        Hope to hear back from you soon again!

        Cheers,

        Shimul

        Comment

        • jdk787
          josh kinman
          • Apr 2014
          • 72

          #5
          Originally posted by Shimul View Post
          Hello,

          I am finally running of my sample on the Miseq using MiSeq V3. I have checked the machine now and it shows that after 70 cycles, the >=Q30 is 96%, cluster passing filter 91.4%, and the cluster density is 1092K/mm.

          Do you think that the run is going well?

          Hope to hear back from you soon again!

          Cheers,

          Shimul
          Those numbers are good, so the run is probably going well.
          Josh Kinman

          Comment

          • Shimul
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2017
            • 8

            #6
            jdk787

            Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
            Those numbers are good, so the run is probably going well.
            Thanks a lot Josh!

            Cheers,

            Shimul

            Comment

            • HESmith
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 512

              #7
              @Shimul, it is not necessary to post the same question multiple times on the forum. Your run metrics look good.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              41 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              26 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...