Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • linda_kohn
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 3

    Joining single end and paired end data in RNA seq

    Hi,

    I've been trying to join one single end and one paired end data set (both Illumina HiSeq) in an RNA seq experiment. The PE data has been trimmed to the same length as the SE and I used only R1. 12 libraries were sequenced by both SE and PE. The read depth of the PE data was substantially lower than the SE.

    MDS plotting of TMM normalized cpms of the replicates shows a batch effect between SE and PE. The pearson correlations of normalized cpms are also quite poor, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99.

    So, is it even possible to join SE and PE data for RNA seq? Or can the difference I'm seeing be due difference in sequence chemistry?

    The ComBat function in the sva package removes the batch effect and the replicates cluster perfectly afterwards. However, I've seen threads saying that batch removed data should only be used for clustering purposes and is not meant to be continued working with.

    The RNA data is meant for pattern recognition, not DEG analysis...
  • shunyip
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 20

    #2
    Have you tried analyzing the PE dataset as a PE dataset (don't trim them to the same length as SE and use both reads) to obtain expression data?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    14 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...