Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MikhailFokin
    Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 15

    #1

    Dynamic/timeline RNAseq experiment design, reps vs time-points?

    Hi all, I am planning the time-course RNAseq study. Obviously, I am interested in max number of time-points, but I am limited by number of samples I can afford

    So, options are
    A. 3 biol reps X 2 time-points
    B. 2 biol reps X 3 time-points
    C. 1 biol reps X 6 time-points

    Some extra info:
    - I am not planning "Nature" article... thx for applause it is a kind of in-house experiment
    - I am interested, first of all, in a few dozens of genes, so I can test some of them by qPCR to be sure that my biol reps are identical (for each time-point) before NGS. I've studied the same kind of model before and biol reps were 99.999% identical in terms of expression

    Option A is traditional, but I think (and I am biased towards) that with option C I will be able to use something like genome-scale correlation analysis to group genes into co-expressed cohorts much more effectively than in var.A

    Any strong cons against option C?

    PS there were couple of similar questions before... with no answers
    Last edited by MikhailFokin; 09-19-2017, 01:09 PM.
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #2
    What organism? How closely related are the individuals?

    Comment

    • MikhailFokin
      Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 15

      #3
      thx luc!
      The organism - diploid mold, ~2x10k genes of which I am interested in ~100 highly expressed specific genes.

      Biol reps - are from exactly the same strain, the same inoculum. So they are identical (except harvesting time i.e. growth phase).
      The main goal is to investigate dynamics and correlations between different genes in time (in case of any concerns I can check more reps by qPCR).
      Last edited by MikhailFokin; 09-19-2017, 12:39 PM.

      Comment

      • MikhailFokin
        Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 15

        #4
        technically with option C (1 rep x 6 times), I will have multiple (by number of genes) vectors of length 6. And will be able to group them into clusters by absolute or relative expression

        Comment

        • luc
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 469

          #5
          Hi Mikhail,
          I would suggest to have your cake and eat it too (three replicates and six time points) by using a cheaper RNA-seq protocol. Assuming you have a reference genome and gene annotations, 3'-Tag-Seq should give you all the data needed. You could use for example kits from Amaryllis Nucleics or Lexogen.

          Comment

          • MikhailFokin
            Member
            • Mar 2014
            • 15

            #6
            Thank you! Interesting options... Since there is clearly the gap between qPCR and RNAseq.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...