Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lahloulamiaa@gmail.com
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2016
    • 7

    small ran seq illumina

    Hello,

    We just sequenced the banks you made from your NEBNext Small RNA kit.


    On the other hand, it is totally impossible for us to analyze the data, you can see that the sequences contain almost only N after demultiplexing, while the quality of the sequencing run is perfect.
    lam
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You are going to need to provide more information than that to get useful help. If the reads only contain N's after demultiplexing then there is not much you can do but start diagnosing what went wrong. First with the run and then work backwards all the way to the sample prep, if needed.

    Comment

    • lahloulamiaa@gmail.com
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2016
      • 7

      #3
      for the quality of the run it was very good,
      but the fastQ file contains almost 90% of N
      and no miRNA
      lam

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        What sequencer was this run on? What kind of chemistry was used? If 90% of your reads at N's then that is not a good run.

        Comment

        • lahloulamiaa@gmail.com
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2016
          • 7

          #5
          but the result of the run shows that it is of good quality it is a "miseq illumina"
          with a NEB bank preparation
          lam

          Comment

          • lahloulamiaa@gmail.com
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2016
            • 7

            #6
            I just ran a MiSeq V3 150 cycles run (SR 50 bp only) with 12 libraries preparation with the "NEBNext Small RNA kit" from NEB. I also launched a adaptor trimming after the run (TruSeq adaptor).
            Library profils are OK :


            We have a problem because the run quality and demultiplexing are perfect to me.

            But when we look at the fastQ files (for all of the samples), samples have approximatly 1.5M raw reads but almost 90% of the sequences are "N" with a very bad Qscore.

            For example, I send you a sample fastQ file "86CorG1".
            Post trimming : sequences are +/- 35 bp long (what we are expected).
            Post filtration on a Q20 (to eliminate the "N" sequences) : 179.595 reads remained.
            After analysis on BaseSpase : no miRNA detected.

            Do you have an explanation for that? How is it possible that the quality run has a Q30 but the individual sample is at Q2-Q3 only?
            Can the problem came from the adaptor trimming?

            Thank you for your help,
            Best,
            lam

            Comment

            • jdk787
              josh kinman
              • Apr 2014
              • 72

              #7
              Take a look at this thread, it addresses the same issue you are having.
              Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)


              After trimming the adapters on the MiSeq you are left with short sequences that MiSeq Reporter masks with NNNs.
              Josh Kinman

              Comment

              • GenoMax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 7142

                #8
                @josh: Thanks for the reminder.

                @[email protected]: Re-demux the run without the adapter sequence in SampleSheet. You can then remove the adapter sequences with a different program. I recommend bbduk.sh from BBMap suite with literal=your_RNA_adapter_sequence option.
                Last edited by GenoMax; 09-27-2017, 06:34 AM.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                  ...
                  07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                0 responses
                24 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                33 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                34 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...