We are preparing RNA-Seq libraries for Illumina HiSeq 3000. However, a few of the libraries are low in concentration (<5 nM, tested on Agilent Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA chip) and we can not go back for RNA isolation. Can we take aliquot of 2 ul from the library and re-amplify for 5 cycles (and bead purify) to ensure proper yield? And can we use this data for following analysis (compare gene expression levels)?
-
-
Hi Jin1,
I assume you will be pooling multiple libraries? ; thus, the molarity of the final pool will have to meet the requirements of your sequencing service -- not the individual libraries.
If you also have higher concentrated libraries it is very likely that the final concentration will be no problem.
I would very much avoid amplifying a subset of the libraries in additional PCR reactions and cleanups - this likely could introduce technical variation. I would rather amplify all if absolutely needed. -
Hi Luc,
Thanks for your reply! The re-amplification is only for one or two samples (out of hundred; and are from different biological replicates) which failed to get enough yield.Comment
-
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...Yesterday, 09:55 AM -
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...
Comment