Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ngs
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 2

    #1

    multiple FPKM problem for single gene in gene_exp.diff after running cuffdiff

    I ran tophat (1.1.0) without a mouse gtf file. Run cufflinks (0.9.1) without a mouse gtf file. Then run cuffcompare with a mouse gtf file and two gtf files generated from cufflinks for my two samples. Finally, I ran cuffdiff with compare.combined.gtf and two accepted_hits.bam files.

    However, I checked one of the cuffdiff output files: gene_exp.diff. I found there is still multiple FPKM problem for many genes (see below):

    XLOC_000009 Cspp1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 44.5012 58.359 0.271096 -2.93789 0.00330457 yes
    XLOC_000010 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 10.0582 7.68137 -0.269589 4.88261 1.04688e-06 yes
    XLOC_000011 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 40.66 31.8566 -0.244 17.6406 0 yes
    XLOC_000013 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 2.7768 40.8059 2.68753 -144.972 0 yes
    XLOC_000015 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 54.0345 65.0081 0.18489 -12.9339 0 yes
    XLOC_000016 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 23.4654 43.6672 0.62107 -29.4492 0 yes
    XLOC_000031 Tram2 chr1:20986216-20997026 q1 q2 OK 5.8219 2.96147 -0.67594 3.70609 0.000210487 yes
    XLOC_000032 Tram2 chr1:20986216-20997026 q1 q2 OK 3.33419 14.9065 1.49757 -29.7646 0 yes
    XLOC_000057 Tmem131 chr1:36849038-36996484 q1 q2 OK 37.3723 30.8444 -0.191975 5.03247 4.84195e-07 yes

    Did I do something wrong? Wht do some genes only have one FPKM (one row) and some genes have multple FPKM (multple rows)?

    I have another question regarding gene_exp.diff file. The first gene Cspp1 has the same coordiates (chr1:10053629-10189988) as the second gene Arfgef1. But in my mouse gtf file (from Ensembl), the coordinates for those two genes are:
    Cspp1: Chromosome 1: 10,028,299-10,126,849
    Arfgef1: Chromosome 1: 10,127,652-10,222,751

    Those two genes are not overlapped. Why do they have the same coordinates in gene_exp.diff file?

    Thank you very much!
  • reut
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 19

    #2
    I have the same issue of multiple lines per gene

    I have this issue as well -
    can anyone explain why there are multiple lines per gene?
    is it valid or indicate a problem?
    how can I reduce it to have 1 line per gene?

    hope now someone will answer,
    thanks

    Comment

    • gzentner
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 5

      #3
      Bump - I have been wondering this same thing myself.

      I thought the gene_exp.diff was supposed to sum or average the FPKMs for each gene to give an overall expression level.

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        Cuffcompare IS reporting one line per gene, but the "genes" it cares about are the XLOC models, not the ones named in column 2. The gene names from your GTF file(s) (column 2) merely report the closest annotated gene model to the models developed by cufflinks/cuffcompare.

        I ran tophat (1.1.0) without a mouse gtf file. Run cufflinks (0.9.1) without a mouse gtf file. Then run cuffcompare with a mouse gtf file and two gtf files generated from cufflinks for my two samples. Finally, I ran cuffdiff with compare.combined.gtf and two accepted_hits.bam files.
        To get results which solely report previously annotated genes you should run TopHat with the "-G mm9.gtf --no-novel-junctions" and then run Cufflinks with "-G mm9.gtf"
        Last edited by kmcarr; 03-30-2011, 05:36 AM.

        Comment

        • Camg
          Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 21

          #5
          A similar thing happened with my gene.exp.diff file where the first few genes have the correct ID's matching those in the gtf file and have different FPKM's, but the coordinates are the same (they all match that of the very first gene from .gtf).

          This seems more like a glitch to me since it seems to only occur for the first few lines of the exp.diff file. Is this the same for everyone else? or did you find this phenomenon at random throughout your exp.diff file? Also, if cuffdiff were really having a problem where it considered several genes to have identical coordinates then wouldn't the FPKMs be the same as well?

          I hope that makes some sense, and thanks everyone for the comments.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...