Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ritzriya
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 49

    #1

    Digital gene expression count from RNA-seq??

    Dear All,


    1) I have been working to code for a tool to get the digital gene expression count for genes across different samples. I wanted to know that can the Digital gene expression level be taken as the number of reads mapping to that gene?

    If yes, then is that an accurate way of estimation of getting the expression level without going for a separate experiment to find the levels?

    2) Also, I have heard that using cufflinks coverage, we can derive at a count for a gene - is that true? I found it confusing as the coverage values provided by the software, is observed always in decimals as 0.007 or may be 1.05. How can a gene be expressed in such terms? Am i missing some logic here?

    Will be glad to receive some answers for the above queries.

    Thanks in advance!
  • ritzriya
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 49

    #2
    Has this been repeated in the forum?

    ***************************
    I wonder if this question has been answered in some other thread! I am sorry if I did so, but can anyone give a quick link to it if yes?

    If no, how come noone has the answer in SEQanswers!!? Strange..

    Please help.. I need it asap..

    Originally posted by ritzriya View Post
    Dear All,


    1) I have been working to code for a tool to get the digital gene expression count for genes across different samples. I wanted to know that can the Digital gene expression level be taken as the number of reads mapping to that gene?

    If yes, then is that an accurate way of estimation of getting the expression level without going for a separate experiment to find the levels?

    2) Also, I have heard that using cufflinks coverage, we can derive at a count for a gene - is that true? I found it confusing as the coverage values provided by the software, is observed always in decimals as 0.007 or may be 1.05. How can a gene be expressed in such terms? Am i missing some logic here?

    Will be glad to receive some answers for the above queries.

    Thanks in advance!

    Comment

    • Simon Anders
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 995

      #3
      Originally posted by ritzriya View Post
      ***************************
      I wonder if this question has been answered in some other thread! I am sorry if I did so, but can anyone give a quick link to it if yes?
      If no, how come noone has the answer in SEQanswers!!? Strange..
      Please help.. I need it asap..
      Maybe you are a little bit impatient.

      If you want to count the number of reads falling onto a gene, maybe have a look at my HTSeq framework, especially the htseq-count schript.

      Whether this is a good measure for the gene expression depends on what you mean by the latter.

      - If you want to compare one gene across several samples, normalization is crucial, but simple. See the section on normalization in our paper on DESeq or Robinson and Oshlack's paper on the subject.

      - If you want to compare the expression of different genes within the same sample, you need to divide by the transcript length, and for this, you need to know which transcript is expressed. This is discussed in the Cufflinks paper.

      Simon

      Comment

      • ritzriya
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 49

        #4
        Thank you Simon for the reply! Yes I guess I was being a little impatient...oops..

        Well, I shall have a look at the links you have provided.. thank you again..

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...