Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ritzriya
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 49

    #1

    Digital gene expression count from RNA-seq??

    Dear All,


    1) I have been working to code for a tool to get the digital gene expression count for genes across different samples. I wanted to know that can the Digital gene expression level be taken as the number of reads mapping to that gene?

    If yes, then is that an accurate way of estimation of getting the expression level without going for a separate experiment to find the levels?

    2) Also, I have heard that using cufflinks coverage, we can derive at a count for a gene - is that true? I found it confusing as the coverage values provided by the software, is observed always in decimals as 0.007 or may be 1.05. How can a gene be expressed in such terms? Am i missing some logic here?

    Will be glad to receive some answers for the above queries.

    Thanks in advance!
  • ritzriya
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 49

    #2
    Has this been repeated in the forum?

    ***************************
    I wonder if this question has been answered in some other thread! I am sorry if I did so, but can anyone give a quick link to it if yes?

    If no, how come noone has the answer in SEQanswers!!? Strange..

    Please help.. I need it asap..

    Originally posted by ritzriya View Post
    Dear All,


    1) I have been working to code for a tool to get the digital gene expression count for genes across different samples. I wanted to know that can the Digital gene expression level be taken as the number of reads mapping to that gene?

    If yes, then is that an accurate way of estimation of getting the expression level without going for a separate experiment to find the levels?

    2) Also, I have heard that using cufflinks coverage, we can derive at a count for a gene - is that true? I found it confusing as the coverage values provided by the software, is observed always in decimals as 0.007 or may be 1.05. How can a gene be expressed in such terms? Am i missing some logic here?

    Will be glad to receive some answers for the above queries.

    Thanks in advance!

    Comment

    • Simon Anders
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 995

      #3
      Originally posted by ritzriya View Post
      ***************************
      I wonder if this question has been answered in some other thread! I am sorry if I did so, but can anyone give a quick link to it if yes?
      If no, how come noone has the answer in SEQanswers!!? Strange..
      Please help.. I need it asap..
      Maybe you are a little bit impatient.

      If you want to count the number of reads falling onto a gene, maybe have a look at my HTSeq framework, especially the htseq-count schript.

      Whether this is a good measure for the gene expression depends on what you mean by the latter.

      - If you want to compare one gene across several samples, normalization is crucial, but simple. See the section on normalization in our paper on DESeq or Robinson and Oshlack's paper on the subject.

      - If you want to compare the expression of different genes within the same sample, you need to divide by the transcript length, and for this, you need to know which transcript is expressed. This is discussed in the Cufflinks paper.

      Simon

      Comment

      • ritzriya
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 49

        #4
        Thank you Simon for the reply! Yes I guess I was being a little impatient...oops..

        Well, I shall have a look at the links you have provided.. thank you again..

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...