Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Noa
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 62

    Optimal RNA preservation pre-sample prep over long time

    I have an experiment planned in which RNA samples will be collected during a clinical study over the course of a year. I plan to use Qiagen RNeasy Micro kit for RNA prep

    Which is the best option to minimize biases and maximize RNA stability and integrity (for future use in RNASeq):

    1) Save cells as pellet in -80C; prepare using RNAprep kit after all samples are collected (roughly 1 year storage time)

    2) Start RNAPrep procedure, adding the first buffer and homogenizingg; saving homogenized cell lysate for up to 3 months in -80C; and processing collected samples every ~3 months.

    3) Prepare each RNA sample immediately and store as RNA in -80C until ready to perform library prep on all clinical samples simultaneously.

    Happy for advice on best method and rationale!
    Thanks
    Noa
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #2
    I do not have any data to support my opinion.
    I would go with number 1, due to the consistency of the RNA isolations - they will be all prepped at the same time by the same person. RNA is stable if stored right.

    You could also extend option 2 to store the sample in RLT for the entire year at -80C.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...