Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mercier
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 5

    #31
    Ribominus

    Originally posted by walle View Post
    Hi wiggy

    I have tried Ribominus and it does not work.. might be my RNA is degraded.. I have never analyzed 18S and 28S rRNA by qRTPCR. Could you please let me know how to do it?

    Thanks
    walle
    Hello,

    I'm trying to improve the rRNA depletion with the Ribominus for RNA-seq but at this time I can recover only 250 ng of rRNA depleted RNA with 10 µg at the beginning...
    They say that normally I have to recover between 1 and 2 µg...
    But the depletion works... Can I know how much you recover?

    Comment

    • neveaire
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 6

      #32
      Using the ribominus kit from Invitrogen, I generally recover between 5-10% of mRNA from total RNA (from human cell lines). I've been starting with 2-3 ug, so 250ng seems very low given your starting input. I have noticed that instead of incubating at 37C on a heat block, a water bath works much better.

      Comment

      • mercier
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 5

        #33
        Thank's for your reply... I've used first a heat block for the 70°C incubation and after directly transfert to a heat block at 37°C... Did you let the tube in the same bath and cold in it during the following 30 minutes?

        Comment

        • ETHANol
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 308

          #34
          There are a few threads here where people say RiboZero works way better then Ribominus.
          --------------
          Ethan

          Comment

          • protist
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2009
            • 101

            #35
            Originally posted by mercier View Post
            Thank's for your reply... I've used first a heat block for the 70°C incubation and after directly transfert to a heat block at 37°C... Did you let the tube in the same bath and cold in it during the following 30 minutes?
            I have used and RiboMinus both for eukaryotic and bacterial libraries and have never achieved anything near the quoted depletion. I have been using RiboZero for the few months and have seen a vast improvement. For one set of libraries where the best depletion we could get with RiboMinus was a mere 20% (80% rRNA in seq reads) the same RNA treated with RibZero only had 5% rRNA contaminating reads. I tried many tweaks to get better results with the RiboMinus but was unsuccessful. For our bacterial libraries the RiboZero is more expensive than RiboMinus but the mRNA read number bump we get makes it worth it.

            Comment

            • neveaire
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 6

              #36
              Originally posted by mercier View Post
              Thank's for your reply... I've used first a heat block for the 70°C incubation and after directly transfert to a heat block at 37°C... Did you let the tube in the same bath and cold in it during the following 30 minutes?
              So I used a heat block for the 70C incubation and did all 37C incubations (30 or 15min) in a water bath. It worked well for me using the eukaryotic kit, but others have had better luck with the Epibio ribozero kit. I've been meaning to try that as well, but if you get something that works, best to stick with it. Good luck.

              Comment

              • ramsemm
                Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 12

                #37
                Hi All,

                I am interested in looking at the metatranscriptome of some soil samples. We are not sure if we will specifically target only bacteria or just look at mRNA from everything in the samples. But, I wanted to post here and see what more experience transcriptomics individuals think.

                Originally, I looked into what to do if we were wanting to look at mRNA from everything in the soil, and it seemed as though Epicentre's exonuclease was the best bet. However, then I read a paper describing the biases associated with using exonuclease to remove rRNA.

                So, then I thought we should just select one group either bacteria or eukaryotes, most likely bacteria. I am planning to use the MoBio PowerSoil RNA Isolation kit for the total RNA extraction. I have seen only two kit options for enrichment of bacterial mRNA, one is the MicrobeExpress kit and the other is the RiboZero Meta Bacteria kit. Now, I noticed with the MicrobeExpress kit they recommend you also use the MegaClear kit to remove 5S rRNA and tRNAs. Is this what others typically do? Also, is there any mRNA enrichment kit that also includes or pairs well with a DNase treatment? Or is this usually necessary?

                My overall goal with these samples is to get total RNA extracted and enrich for mRNA. These samples will then be sent for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq for a 2x100bp run. Does anyone out there have any suggestions on handling/processing of the total RNA to enrich for either overall mRNA (prokaryotic and eukaryotic; without significant bias) or just bacterial mRNA? I have been looking through the literature but there seems to be a lot of variability.

                Thank you all in advance!

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                30 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                96 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                0 responses
                115 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                0 responses
                109 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...