Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marcha
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2019
    • 2

    GSNAP error Problem Sequence

    Hi everybody,

    For my RNA-seq analysis, I wanted to use GSNAP to align my reads.
    Building the index ran without any problems, but when I actually start mapping my reads I get first get Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup, and thereafter "Problem sequence" after which the program stops.

    This is the command I used:
    gsnapl --nthreads 6 -d gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019 -D ${GENOMEDIR} ${READ1}${SUFFIX2} ${READ2}${SUFFIX2} -A sam --output-file ${align_DIR_GSNAP}${READ1:${#SOURCEDIR}:-${#SUFFIX1}-${#PAIR1}}_GSNAP.sam -N 1

    This is what is printed in the terminal:
    [ALIGNING] GSNAP : [APA_The_000_2]
    GSNAP version 2019-06-10 called with args: gsnapl.avx2 --nthreads 6 -d gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019 -D /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019/ /share/analysis/CEFIC/CEFIC_testdata/HeCaToS_APA/Trimmed_reads_trimmomatic/APA_The_000_2_R1.fastq /share/analysis/CEFIC/CEFIC_testdata/HeCaToS_APA/Trimmed_reads_trimmomatic/APA_The_000_2_R2.fastq -A sam --output-file /share/analysis/CEFIC/CEFIC_testdata/HeCaToS_APA/Trimmed_reads_trimmomatic/GSNAP/APA__GSNAP.sam -N 1
    Novel splicing (-N) turned on => assume reads are RNA-Seq
    Checking compiler assumptions for SSE2: 6B8B4567 327B23C6 xor=59F066A1
    Checking compiler assumptions for SSE4.1: -103 -58 max=198 => compiler zero extends
    Checking compiler assumptions for SSE4.2 options: 6B8B4567 __builtin_clz=1 __builtin_ctz=0 _mm_popcnt_u32=17 __builtin_popcount=17
    Finished checking compiler assumptions
    Allocating memory for compressed genome (oligos)...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.genomecomp...done (21,344,119,460 bytes, 13.84 sec)
    Allocating memory for compressed genome (bits)...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.genomebits128...done (21,344,119,488 bytes, 48.13 sec)
    Looking for index files in directory /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019
    Pointers file is gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153offsets64meta
    Offsets file is gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153offsets64strm
    Positions files are gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153positionsh and gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153positions
    Offsets compression type: bitpack64
    Allocating memory for ref offset pointers, kmer 15, interval 3...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153offsets64meta...done (134,217,744 bytes, 0.13 sec)
    Allocating memory for ref offsets, kmer 15, interval 3...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153offsets64strm...done (481,344,896 bytes, 0.36 sec)
    Allocating memory for ref positions, kmer 15, interval 3...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153positionsh...done (1,029,358,013 bytes, 2.49 sec)
    Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref153positions...done (4,117,432,052 bytes, 9.28 sec)
    Looking for local files in directory /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019
    Table file is gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081loctable
    Pointers file is gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081locoffsets64meta
    Offsets file is gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081locoffsets64strm
    Positions file is gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081locpositions
    Allocating memory for ref offset pointers, kmer 8, interval 1...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081locoffsets64meta...done (3,557,355,520 bytes, 3.70 sec)
    Allocating memory for ref offsets, kmer 8, interval 1...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081locoffsets64strm...done (1,828,434,688 bytes, 4.19 sec)
    Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081loctable...done (6,947,968 bytes, 0.02 sec)
    Allocating memory for ref positions, kmer 8, interval 1...Attached new memory for /share/tools/data/genomes/GRCh38_r96_april2019//gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019/gsnap_GRCh38_apr2019.ref081locpositions...done (6,176,172,160 bytes, 14.58 sec)
    Starting alignment. Writing results to /share/analysis/CEFIC/CEFIC_testdata/HeCaToS_APA/Trimmed_reads_trimmomatic/GSNAP/APA__GSNAP.sam
    Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup
    Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup
    Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup
    Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup
    Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup
    Signal received: SIGSEGV
    Calling Access_emergency_cleanup
    Removed existing memory for shmid 347209834
    Removed existing memory for shmid 346980450
    Removed existing memory for shmid 346947667
    Removed existing memory for shmid 347013219
    Removed existing memory for shmid 347177065

    You may want to run 'ipcs -m' to see if any shared memory segments are still in use
    You can remove a shared memory segment manually by doing 'ipcrm -m <shmid>'

    Problem sequence: HWI-ST1172:242:CBVAFACXX:1:1101:6590:2214 (100 bp)
    >HWI-ST1172:242:CBVAFACXX:1:1101:6590:2214
    TTGAACGTTCCATGAGCAGCGAGGTGAACCCAGAACCAGTTCCCCCACCAAAGCTGTGGAAAACCAAGAAGCCCTGGAGACCCGTGCACTGGTCGGCCAG
    AGCCCCGGGCAGTGTTTGTAGACTTGGAACCCACAGTCATTGATGAAGTTCGCACTGGCACCTACCGCCAGCTCTTCCACCCTGAGCAACTTATCACAGG


    Does anyone know what is exactly the problem here and how to fix this?
    Thanks already,
    Marcha
  • emortiz
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2015
    • 3

    #2
    I realize almost a year passed since this question was asked. I had the same error recently, so after a lot of troubleshooting I found the cause. I had indexed my reference specifying some of the chromosomes as circular and that was causing this particular error, not on every sample though, but very annoying. Once I re-indexed the genome without marking any chromosome as circular the mapping worked without errors.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
      by seqadmin


      This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

      The Headliner
      The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
      03-03-2025, 01:39 PM
    • seqadmin
      Investigating the Gut Microbiome Through Diet and Spatial Biology
      by seqadmin




      The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...
      02-24-2025, 06:31 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
    0 responses
    187 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...