Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aquila
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 6

    Error message in DESeq (estimateVaranceFunctions, preplot.locfit.raw)

    Hello all, I am receiving an error message in DESeq which I do not understand. I have data from 14 samples (7 samples for condition A and 7 samples for condition B). If I run DESeq on all samples, it works without error messages. However, if I just choose a subset of the samples (3 samples for condition A and 3 samples for condition B), it may or may not work, depending on the subset.

    When trying to run estimateVarianceFunctions(cds), I get the following error message and no variance functions are added:

    Code:
    Error in preplot.locfit.raw(object, newdata, where, what, band) :  
      NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 2)
    I have not been able to figure out where the function encounters these NA/NaN/Inf values and what could be done to make it work. Does anyone have suggestions?

    In addition, the size factors are all estimated to 1. This seems to cause the following warnings:

    Code:
    1: In lfproc(x, y, weights = weights, cens = cens, base = base, geth = geth,  :  
      compparcomp: perfect fit
    2: In lfproc(x, y, weights = weights, cens = cens, base = base, geth = geth,  :  
      procv: parameters out of bounds
    It does not appear to me that this is the culprit that causes the variance function estimation to fail, but I may be wrong.

    Any help is appreciated.

    Regards,
    aquila
    Last edited by aquila; 02-02-2011, 03:13 AM. Reason: better formatting
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    #2
    have you any NA value in your count table ?

    if there are some NA values, you can change them to 0 and retry DESeq .

    Otherwhise Simon Anders can help you

    Comment

    • aquila
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 6

      #3
      Hi NicoBxl,
      Thanks for your reply. No, I do not have NA values in my count table.
      The strange thing is that the analysis runs without error if I use all my samples. The error occurs only if I leave out some of the samples.

      Comment

      • NicoBxl
        not just another member
        • Aug 2010
        • 264

        #4
        can you copy paste your commands

        Comment

        • aquila
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 6

          #5
          Hi, thank you for your continued help. The issue has been resolved. The reason for the error message was a problem with my input data, not with my DESeq usage. The error seems to occur if there are no entries where the count is 0.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...