Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Carcharodon View Post
    I see! Well, I'd recommend using a ratio slightly less than 1.8x. I'd lower that to 1.5x or so and see if it makes a difference (30 uL AmpureXP to 20 uL ladder dilution).
    Thanks. I have chosen this ratio because I am planning to do 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing so I have 96 samples and I will do nested PCR. So what do you think about this ?
    Many thanks

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by hssalgh2 View Post
      Thanks. I have chosen this ratio because I am planning to do 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing so I have 96 samples and I will do nested PCR. So what do you think about this ?
      Many thanks
      I don't think it should be much of a problem, unless I'm misunderstanding something. If the lower ratio is a concern, I would recommend taking one (or a few) of your PCR products and trying both ratios on them, running them out on a gel.

      So on the gel you would run:

      1) PCR Product w/o cleanup
      2) PCR Product w/ cleanup at 1.8x
      3) PCR Product w/ cleanup at 1.5x

      ...and see if there's a difference.

      It's a bit of extra work, but it's a small price to pay for peace of mind. This approach may also be better than testing on a ladder, since you'll be working with the PCR products directly (rather than with a ladder which may or may not have an inhibitory effect on the SPRI beads).

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Carcharodon View Post
        I don't think it should be much of a problem, unless I'm misunderstanding something. If the lower ratio is a concern, I would recommend taking one (or a few) of your PCR products and trying both ratios on them, running them out on a gel.

        So on the gel you would run:

        1) PCR Product w/o cleanup
        2) PCR Product w/ cleanup at 1.8x
        3) PCR Product w/ cleanup at 1.5x

        ...and see if there's a difference.

        It's a bit of extra work, but it's a small price to pay for peace of mind. This approach may also be better than testing on a ladder, since you'll be working with the PCR products directly (rather than with a ladder which may or may not have an inhibitory effect on the SPRI beads).
        Ok. I will do waht you suggested. Then I see
        I am thinking about PCR cycling for the first round is 18 cycle and in the second round is25cycle so is it ok to increase the cycle in the first round to 35 cycle what do you suggest?
        Many thanks

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by hssalgh2 View Post
          Ok. I will do waht you suggested. Then I see
          I am thinking about PCR cycling for the first round is 18 cycle and in the second round is25cycle so is it ok to increase the cycle in the first round to 35 cycle what do you suggest?
          Many thanks
          This is probably better left for someone else to answer. I don't have any real experience with this protocol. I've gone toe-to-toe with the beads more than a few times, but nested PCR is another story.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by hssalgh2 View Post
            Ok. I will do waht you suggested. Then I see
            I am thinking about PCR cycling for the first round is 18 cycle and in the second round is25cycle so is it ok to increase the cycle in the first round to 35 cycle what do you suggest?
            Many thanks
            It depends on your experiment and input. It is not clear if you are preparing 16S region specific library for sequencing on Illumina systems or whole 16S for long read sequencing.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • seqadmin
              Recent Advances in Sequencing Analysis Tools
              by seqadmin


              The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...
              Today, 07:48 AM
            • seqadmin
              Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
              by seqadmin




              The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
              04-22-2024, 07:01 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by seqadmin, Today, 07:17 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 05-02-2024, 08:06 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-30-2024, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Started by seqadmin, 04-29-2024, 10:49 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seqadmin  
            Working...
            X