Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sinnafoch
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2013
    • 9

    Normalizing Illumina RNA libraries

    Hi,

    I am relatively new to the Genomics/Transcriptomics game and about to prep Illumina TrueSeq Total RNA libraries from fungal RNA. I read through the instructions several times, everything seems quite clear to me except the Normalize/Pooling step at the very end.

    Isn't the normalization step just important when doing comparative Transcriptomics?
    I need transcriptomes just to assist genome annotation, so normalization is not a big issue. Am I right?


    Thank you for your help!
    Last edited by sinnafoch; 11-06-2013, 08:26 AM.
  • JeremyDay
    Registered Vendor
    • Feb 2012
    • 25

    #2
    The final normalization is for pooling multiplexed samples. Its main purpose is to pool each individual library at equimolar concentrations. Illumina normally advises normalizing the libraries to the same concentration, then pooling by combining same volumes of each library. Or, you can quantitate each library and combine different volumes after calculating, however, do not do this method if your library concentrations have a high range. You could potentially pool without doing this, but then you run the risk of some libraries having lots of reads and displacing the reads required for other libraries. If some libraries require more reads or less, you can account for this when pooling.

    Comment

    • woshiliangliang
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2013
      • 8

      #3
      Hi sinnafoch,
      i think you mistake the 2 application of the word "normalization".
      as you metioned in your question,
      if you need transcriptomes to assist genome annotation,
      you also can perform a normalization step in order to reduce the risk of sequencing only highly expressed genes.
      meanwhile the results cannot show actual gene expression levels between samples.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      5 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      50 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      110 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...