Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • korchid
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 1

    Library preparation for negative control sample?

    Hello,

    I'm wondering if anyone has experience with making libraries with your negative control ChIP sample? I am trying to pull down a particular factor in the wild type cells and also performing the same experiment with cells not expressing that factor to serve as the negative control as the antibody is not that specific, and there is a certain degree of non-specific binding judged from my previous sequencing result.

    Now I'm trying to repeat this experiment and make libraries for both of these two samples again. My question is during the PCR enrichment step, if I PCR amplify my negative sample additional cylces to have enough material for making the library, will that reduece my signal-noise ratio? My concern is that the antibody will pull down something from the genome even in the cells not expressing the factor, and if it's over amplified to a degree that the signal is similar to that from my actual ChIP sampe from the wild type cells, does that mean potentially I will lose some real binding site, as there is amplicon showing up in the negative sample as well...

    I don't know if this is making sense, but if you have any experience or suggestion, that would be highly appreciated..

    Thanks!!
    Korchid

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...