Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep QC- extra peak at around 1500bp

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep QC- extra peak at around 1500bp

    I used the NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep for illumina to prepare the library and follow the standard protocol with 250ng DNA input, 8 PCR cycle and size selection for target total library size ~400bp.

    However, I noted that quite a number of samples in the same preparation showed an extra peak at around 1600bp (slightly >1500bp, refer to the attached Bioanalyzer profile lanes 4, 5, 7 to 11).

    From some forum discussion, a extra peak at 1500bp might be due to the carryover of magnetic beads. However, the peak in my libraries is not that strong and board compared with the typical magnetic bead leftover bioanalyzer profile.

    Is the extra peak a single-stranded artefact? Do you think it will affect the sequencing of the library? Any another round dual bead size selection is needed to remove that extra peak?

    Thanks very much for your comment.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Leo Lee; 09-19-2014, 08:08 AM.

  • #2
    I would like to attached more bioanalyzer profiles here. I have selected 3 samples from my library batch as an example.

    All 3 samples are proceed in one batch. However, sample A does not have the extra peak beyond 1500bp while samples B and C have!

    Does anyone think that the second peak may represent single-stranded library products that have self-annealed? As I don't think it is due to the magnetic bead carryout as I had already aliquot the library on magnetic stand.

    Will it affect the sample pooling and do the downstream TruSeq Exome capture?

    What can I do to avoid this problem?

    Thanks!
    Leo
    Attached Files

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 10:20 AM
    0 responses
    8 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 06-07-2023, 07:14 AM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 06-06-2023, 01:08 PM
    0 responses
    13 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
    0 responses
    166 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X