Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dca
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 4

    #1

    bacterial RNA sequencing and rRNA removal

    Hello All -
    I know there are a variety of posts on RNA sequencing and rRNA removal. However, I am specifically interested in bacterial transcriptomics and would appreciate advice on 1) sample prep and 2) platform (FLX vs Illumina vs SOLiD)
    1) Bacterial mRNA (mostly) isn't poly-adenylated, so positive selection and PCR-suppression approaches won't work. So, what is the best way to get rid of rRNA and keep the good stuff?
    Do the kits (RiboZero? Ribominus? others?) work?
    A recent Nature Methods paper (http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/...nmeth.1507.pdf) suggested a combination of subtractive rRNA hybridization plus exonuclease methods. What is the preferred/real world approach?
    I've heard good things about DSN for Illumina - but can't find an equivalent method that is compatible with library prep for the FLX. Suggestions?
    Has anyone tried this published method (Biotechniques. 2010 February ; 48(2): 139–144. doi:10.2144/000113350) for positive selection of cDNA via hybridization to genomic DNA ?

    2) The sequencing depth of Illumina and SOLiD make them attractive for RNA-seq... and probably essential for eukaryotic work. However, I have access to a FLX and bacterial genomes are significantly smaller. Do the length of FLX reads compensate for the (potential) lack of depth?
    What about relative costs? Are the new Illumina library prep kits really faster/cheaper/better?

    Thanks for any/all advice!

    dca

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
    by SEQadmin2



    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
    ...
    Yesterday, 11:01 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
    by SEQadmin2


    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
    ...
    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 02:55 AM
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...