Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • austrius
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2021
    • 1

    Indexed RADseq P2-adaptor sequences

    I have successfully used the original single-digest RADseq protocol in the past. Quickly: this protocol digests individual DNA with a single RI (commonly Sbf1). Then, P1-adaptors (each containing a unique barcode to mark individual DNA) are ligated to the sticky end left by the RI. P1-barcode ligated DNA from several individuals is then pooled per library, followed by shearing and P2-adaptor ligation. After some clean-ups and an amplification PCR of RADtags, the library can be sequenced.

    In the past, I have always sequenced one RAD-library per HiSeq Illumina lane. Hence, there was no need for me to have an indexed P2-adaptor. However, I'd now like to adopt my protocol for NovaSeq, which means, I need to design several new P2-adaptors each with a unique index. Thus, each library will get its unique index, allowing me to sequence multiple libraries within the same NovaSeq flowcell.
    I was recommended to use the common single-index TruSeq adaptor as a template to construct my new RADseq P2-adaptors. However, RADseq P2-adaptors have some special properties, including a divergent Y-structure. So this makes the design of new P2-adaptors harder.

    Does anyone have indexed P2-RADseq adaptors they have used successfully to construct single-digest RADseq libraries? If so, would you be willing to share the sequences of these P2-adaptors with me? I'd like to have a total of 10 different P2-adaptors (each with a unique index) so that I will be able to multiplex 10 RADseq libraries and sequence them together on a single Novaseq flowcell.

    Thank you a lot for your help!
    Last edited by austrius; 09-26-2021, 12:41 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...