Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pmiguel
    replied
    All,
    I think the extra peaks phenomenon can derive from a number of different sources. I listed ones that occurred to me here:

    Bridged amplification & clustering followed by sequencing by synthesis. (Genome Analyzer / HiSeq / MiSeq)


    One odd thing in this thread -- the idea that the slower migrating peak is the single stranded one seems contrary to my intuition. But, for Agilent chips I think it is the case. For details see:

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas


    I am just wondering are there resources that state this? The fact that the link upthread is implying that this is the case, suggests there must be. But I had not heard it previously.

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • mountainogre
    replied
    I use the same. I should also mention that I am doing ChIPseq, not RNAseq, so things could be a little different.
    I think I will repeat the prep with less starting material and see if that solves the problem.
    In this case I used 13-15ng on ChIPPed DNA, I think i will try <10ng.

    Leave a comment:


  • zhaoj
    replied
    How much adaptor do you use in each reaction?
    I use 1ul of 10 times diluted from Illumina.

    Leave a comment:


  • mountainogre
    replied
    And in my cases I size select with the e-Gel system. I aimed for the 180-200bp range.
    My situation was similar to jH, in my experiment 2 from 8 libraries had the strange appearance of a stronger band around 260bp, whereas the Bioanalyzer showed appropriate 180bp band only for the other 6 samples.
    I suspect some problem with over-amplification, since the two libraries with the extra band were the ones with the most DNA at the beginning of the protocol.

    Leave a comment:


  • zhaoj
    replied
    I tried cutting out from agarose gel

    Leave a comment:


  • CC_seqanswers
    replied
    May I ask what sizing technique in your case?

    Originally posted by zhaoj View Post
    Not yet, but suspect
    1. RNA leftover
    2. inappropriate ratio of adaptor to DNA
    Frustrated, but I do not see it everytime, hope there will be an answer.

    Good luck with your experiment!

    Leave a comment:


  • zhaoj
    replied
    Not yet, but suspect
    1. RNA leftover
    2. inappropriate ratio of adaptor to DNA
    Frustrated, but I do not see it everytime, hope there will be an answer.

    Good luck with your experiment!

    Leave a comment:


  • mountainogre
    replied
    Hi Jh,
    Did you make any progress solving this problem?
    I have just observed the same thing and i don't know why.
    Have you seen this blog post: http://dnasizing.com/?p=105

    Leave a comment:


  • zhaoj
    started a topic Double band in ChIP-seq lib prep for Illumina

    Double band in ChIP-seq lib prep for Illumina

    I hope somebody can help me out here.

    I often get double band in ChIP-seq lib prep for Illumina platform. One peak is about 200bp, and additional peak around 260bp. This happens often, but not all the time, really annoying. Does any body have clues?

    Could it be bad RNAase or Proteinase K on treating the ChIP samples? Because a recent exp has one old sample working fine (single 200bp peak), but not the new sample.

    Or too much adaptor in the library prep?

    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Jh

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...