Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vineeth_s
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 9

    #1

    tophat / bowtie mapping discrepancies

    I am mapping 50 bp SOLiD RNA-Seq reads to the mouse genome.

    When I use bowtie, I get ~60% mapping (I am running bowtie with -e 950 as has been suggested elsewhere for mapping SOLiD runs with bowtie)

    As there was no direct way to give tophat the -e option, I changed line 872 in the tophat python script from
    Code:
    bowtie_header_cmd = [bowtie_path, "--sam"]
    to
    Code:
    bowtie_header_cmd = [bowtie_path, "--sam", "-e 950"]
    When I run tophat with this option, I still get very poor mapping, of about 25%

    Why is there this discrepancy, as one would assume that all of the unspliced mapping that bowtie does should be reproducible by tophat ?

    Vineeth
  • DZhang
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 177

    #2
    Hi vineeth,

    Please verify with the author(s) if your way of passing "-e 950" from Tophat to Bowtie. From the Tophat manual, it has very limited options to pass parameters to Bowtie. The manual says Tophat is currently optimized for 75bp or longer SOLID reads. I am not sure what it actually means but it might have contributed to your observation.

    Douglas

    Comment

    • vineeth_s
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 9

      #3
      That really should not be an issue as this is the pythonic way (using the subprocess module) of building a command for executing something on the command-line.
      Further when I look at the run logs in the logs folder that TopHat creates, I see the bowtie command formed without issue.

      What I am wondering is since TopHat works serially by first aligning to the genome, then taking the unmapped reads and trying to align it to the splice junction which is where the read length matters (so even if the 75 bp recommendation makes a huge difference) I should only see an increase in mapping as opposed to just using bowtie; what confounds me is why I see the mapping decrease when compared to just using bowtie

      Comment

      • DZhang
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 177

        #4
        Hi Vineeth,

        Conceptually you are right but I am not sure how exactly tophat implements the concept. Again, please send your request to the tophat user forum or the author for a direct answer. At the same time, you may compare the mapping rates b/t Bowtie and Tophat without the option "-e 950" to see the trend? Occasionally these logical machines do illogical things.

        Douglas

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...