Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oiiio
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 105

    #1

    Novoalign with softclipping OFF (-o FullNW)?

    In the latest versions of novoalign, there is some softclipping for local alignment included by default. Supposedly this can be deactivated by using the parameters
    Code:
    -o FullNW
    I have been trying to run novoalign with the following command line, in order to deactivate the softclipping:

    Code:
    novoalign -o SAM -o FullNW -d ref.ndx -f fastq1 fastq2 > file.sam
    The above command runs fine and returns absolutely no errors. BUT, I feel like it is extremely suspicious that the run time is EQUAL regardless of -o FullNW for the same fastq files.

    If you are turning off the local alignment step, shouldn't the mapping take much less time?

    I am still new to NGS, and it probably shows
  • sparks
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 126

    #2
    Originally posted by oiiio View Post
    In the latest versions of novoalign, there is some softclipping for local alignment included by default. Supposedly this can be deactivated by using the parameters
    Code:
    -o FullNW
    I have been trying to run novoalign with the following command line, in order to deactivate the softclipping:

    Code:
    novoalign -o SAM -o FullNW -d ref.ndx -f fastq1 fastq2 > file.sam
    The above command runs fine and returns absolutely no errors. BUT, I feel like it is extremely suspicious that the run time is EQUAL regardless of -o FullNW for the same fastq files.

    If you are turning off the local alignment step, shouldn't the mapping take much less time?

    I am still new to NGS, and it probably shows
    You're right that it doesn't make a noticeable difference. The alignment process is virtually the same in that the alignment location and score are determined by Needleman-Wunsch algorithm. Most of the alignment time is taken finding the best alignment location. We may seed to 10,000's of locations to find one good alignment. Having found the best alignment it is trimmed back to best local alignment but this only happens at the alignment location being reported so it becomes a very small % of cpu time, 1 :: 10,000 of total time.

    Colin

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...