Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lynnatsd
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    question for genotying with bcftools

    hi,

    I am trying to call the genotypes with the mpileup output using bcftools. I found very weird for one SNP, I actually have heterozygous and the DP4 field also indicate so, but the ALT. column output as ".". See example below -

    chr10.fa 128479589 . T . 12.3 . DP=147300;AF1=0.496;CI95=0.5,0.5;DP4=60853,1,79189,2;MQ=59;FQ=-9.5;PV4=1,0,0,0.19 PL 18

    has anybody have the same problem and know a reason for this? thanks!

    - lynn
    ###########################
    The command I am generating the .vcf is

    samtools mpileup -ugf hg19.fasta -C50 -d 10000000 test.bam | bcftools view -cg - > test.vcf

    samtools and bcftools come from samtools-0.1.14
  • blue mood
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 21

    #2
    i have the same problems ,can anyone give some suggestions?

    Comment

    • nilshomer
      Nils Homer
      • Nov 2008
      • 1283

      #3
      Look at "DP4=60853,1,79189,2;". That says to me that the reads are mostly on the same genomic strand. This is very unlikely unless built-in your experiment design, and is better explained by mis-mapping. That is why it is not being called with high confidence.

      Comment

      • win804
        Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 18

        #4
        Originally posted by nilshomer View Post
        Look at "DP4=60853,1,79189,2;". That says to me that the reads are mostly on the same genomic strand. This is very unlikely unless built-in your experiment design, and is better explained by mis-mapping. That is why it is not being called with high confidence.
        Then why PV4 for strand bias is 1? I suppose the p-value for strand bias should be very small? I am sorry, probably I misunderstand the p-value for strand bias. but can you enlighten me please? Thanks.

        Comment

        • nilshomer
          Nils Homer
          • Nov 2008
          • 1283

          #5
          Originally posted by win804 View Post
          Then why PV4 for strand bias is 1? I suppose the p-value for strand bias should be very small? I am sorry, probably I misunderstand the p-value for strand bias. but can you enlighten me please? Thanks.
          I think the -S option in mpileup gives strand bias p-values. Is that turned on?

          Comment

          • win804
            Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 18

            #7
            Thanks Heng.
            That answers my question.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...