Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jameslz
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 20

    tophat 1.3.0 sam output quality string problem

    When I mapped the RNA-seq data to reference genome using tophat 1.3.0 ,I met a problem in the sam output. but the version 1.2.0 did not have such situation.
    Here is the result:
    1. The tophat 1.3.0 result:
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 99 scaffold_8 3915632 255 95M = 3915887 420 GGACCGGTAGAAATTTTCCAATGAGAGATCATGTGAAGATTGAAAAGAAGAGTCCATGACAAATTTACATTGGCTGCTGCAATAGCTGAGGAGCG HHHHHHHFHHHHBHHHHHHFHHHHHFHFFHFGGEGFEGEGGGCFECHHHHHHEHHHFHEEBBEFG@AFFFDFFFFF54;.9;4*.:>>8@B#### NM:i:1 NH:i:1
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 147 scaffold_8 3915887 255 68M70N27M = 3915632 420 TTTCCAAGTCATCCTCGTTGCCAATCGGTGCTTGACCGTCTTGCTGGGCCTCATGGATGCGACGATGTTGTGCCAGGTTGTCTGATCGAGAAAAG * NM:i:0 XS:A:- NH:i:1
    2. The tophat 1.2.0 result:
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 99 scaffold_8 3915632 255 95M = 3915887 0 GGACCGGTAGAAATTTTCCAATGAGAGATCATGTGAAGATTGAAAAGAAGAGTCCATGACAAATTTACATTGGCTGCTGCAATAGCTGAGGAGCG HHHHHHHFHHHHBHHHHHHFHHHHHFHFFHFGGEGFEGEGGGCFECHHHHHHEHHHFHEEBBEFG@AFFFDFFFFF54;.9;4*.:>>8@B#### NM:i:1 NH:i:1
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 147 scaffold_8 3915887 255 68M70N27M = 3915632 0 TTTCCAAGTCATCCTCGTTGCCAATCGGTGCTTGACCGTCTTGCTGGGCCTCATGGATGCGACGATGTTGTGCCAGGTTGTCTGATCGAGAAAAG *?EFEGGGEGD>GGEGGDFHHHEHEHHHHFHHHHFGGFFHDFHHGGHHHHHHHHHHHHGHHFHHHHHHFHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHF NM:i:0 XS:A:- NH:i:1

    whe I use htseq-count , It gives error report.
    python -m HTSeq.scripts.count accepted_hits.unique.sam ../../../pde.release.v3.gff
    39609 GFF lines processed.
    Error occured in line 876 of file accepted_hits.unique.sam.
    Error: ("'seq' and 'qualstr' do not have the same length.", 'line 876 of file accepted_hits.unique.sam')
    [Exception type: ValueError, raised in _HTSeq.pyx:765]

    is it a bug?
  • jameslz
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 20

    #2
    A more question:
    Tophat can't handle reads with different size of length ?

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #3
      The SAM files look OK to me. Notice that in tophat 1.3.0 one of the quality strings is a single * which means data not available, while with tophat 1.2.0 you do get a full quality string which happens to start with a * character (which is valid).

      So, that could be a bug in tophat 1.3.0 (using * for missing qualities when it probably does know them), and a separate bug in htseq-count failing to accept * for missing qualities.

      What version of htseq-count are you using? I had a quick look at HTSeq-0.5.1p2.tar.gz file src/HTSeq/_HTSeq.pyx and there is no obvious sign that they cope with this situation (but I didn't fully explore their code).

      P.S. I've emailed Simon Anders about this possible HTSeq issue.
      Last edited by maubp; 06-16-2011, 02:05 AM.

      Comment

      • jameslz
        Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 20

        #4
        Originally posted by maubp View Post
        The SAM files look OK to me. Notice that in tophat 1.3.0 one of the quality strings is a single * which means data not available, while with tophat 1.2.0 you do get a full quality string which happens to start with a * character (which is valid).

        So, that could be a bug in tophat 1.3.0 (using * for missing qualities when it probably does know them), and a separate bug in htseq-count failing to accept * for missing qualities.

        What version of htseq-count are you using? I had a quick look at HTSeq-0.5.1p2.tar.gz file src/HTSeq/_HTSeq.pyx and there is no obvious sign that they cope with this situation (but I didn't fully explore their code).

        P.S. I've emailed Simon Anders about this possible HTSeq issue.
        Thanks for your answer.
        I use the latest version HTSeq-0.5.1p2.

        Comment

        • jameslz
          Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 20

          #5
          Originally posted by jameslz View Post
          A more question:
          Tophat can't handle reads with different size of length ?
          if I trim the low quality base from the 3' end , I can map 80% paired reads to the reference, if not, just 70% paired reads can be mapped to genome.

          can anyone help me?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...