Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jameslz
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 20

    #1

    tophat 1.3.0 sam output quality string problem

    When I mapped the RNA-seq data to reference genome using tophat 1.3.0 ,I met a problem in the sam output. but the version 1.2.0 did not have such situation.
    Here is the result:
    1. The tophat 1.3.0 result:
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 99 scaffold_8 3915632 255 95M = 3915887 420 GGACCGGTAGAAATTTTCCAATGAGAGATCATGTGAAGATTGAAAAGAAGAGTCCATGACAAATTTACATTGGCTGCTGCAATAGCTGAGGAGCG HHHHHHHFHHHHBHHHHHHFHHHHHFHFFHFGGEGFEGEGGGCFECHHHHHHEHHHFHEEBBEFG@AFFFDFFFFF54;.9;4*.:>>8@B#### NM:i:1 NH:i:1
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 147 scaffold_8 3915887 255 68M70N27M = 3915632 420 TTTCCAAGTCATCCTCGTTGCCAATCGGTGCTTGACCGTCTTGCTGGGCCTCATGGATGCGACGATGTTGTGCCAGGTTGTCTGATCGAGAAAAG * NM:i:0 XS:A:- NH:i:1
    2. The tophat 1.2.0 result:
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 99 scaffold_8 3915632 255 95M = 3915887 0 GGACCGGTAGAAATTTTCCAATGAGAGATCATGTGAAGATTGAAAAGAAGAGTCCATGACAAATTTACATTGGCTGCTGCAATAGCTGAGGAGCG HHHHHHHFHHHHBHHHHHHFHHHHHFHFFHFGGEGFEGEGGGCFECHHHHHHEHHHFHEEBBEFG@AFFFDFFFFF54;.9;4*.:>>8@B#### NM:i:1 NH:i:1
    HWI-ST_0101:7:8:14864:67306#0 147 scaffold_8 3915887 255 68M70N27M = 3915632 0 TTTCCAAGTCATCCTCGTTGCCAATCGGTGCTTGACCGTCTTGCTGGGCCTCATGGATGCGACGATGTTGTGCCAGGTTGTCTGATCGAGAAAAG *?EFEGGGEGD>GGEGGDFHHHEHEHHHHFHHHHFGGFFHDFHHGGHHHHHHHHHHHHGHHFHHHHHHFHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHF NM:i:0 XS:A:- NH:i:1

    whe I use htseq-count , It gives error report.
    python -m HTSeq.scripts.count accepted_hits.unique.sam ../../../pde.release.v3.gff
    39609 GFF lines processed.
    Error occured in line 876 of file accepted_hits.unique.sam.
    Error: ("'seq' and 'qualstr' do not have the same length.", 'line 876 of file accepted_hits.unique.sam')
    [Exception type: ValueError, raised in _HTSeq.pyx:765]

    is it a bug?
  • jameslz
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 20

    #2
    A more question:
    Tophat can't handle reads with different size of length ?

    Comment

    • maubp
      Peter (Biopython etc)
      • Jul 2009
      • 1544

      #3
      The SAM files look OK to me. Notice that in tophat 1.3.0 one of the quality strings is a single * which means data not available, while with tophat 1.2.0 you do get a full quality string which happens to start with a * character (which is valid).

      So, that could be a bug in tophat 1.3.0 (using * for missing qualities when it probably does know them), and a separate bug in htseq-count failing to accept * for missing qualities.

      What version of htseq-count are you using? I had a quick look at HTSeq-0.5.1p2.tar.gz file src/HTSeq/_HTSeq.pyx and there is no obvious sign that they cope with this situation (but I didn't fully explore their code).

      P.S. I've emailed Simon Anders about this possible HTSeq issue.
      Last edited by maubp; 06-16-2011, 02:05 AM.

      Comment

      • jameslz
        Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 20

        #4
        Originally posted by maubp View Post
        The SAM files look OK to me. Notice that in tophat 1.3.0 one of the quality strings is a single * which means data not available, while with tophat 1.2.0 you do get a full quality string which happens to start with a * character (which is valid).

        So, that could be a bug in tophat 1.3.0 (using * for missing qualities when it probably does know them), and a separate bug in htseq-count failing to accept * for missing qualities.

        What version of htseq-count are you using? I had a quick look at HTSeq-0.5.1p2.tar.gz file src/HTSeq/_HTSeq.pyx and there is no obvious sign that they cope with this situation (but I didn't fully explore their code).

        P.S. I've emailed Simon Anders about this possible HTSeq issue.
        Thanks for your answer.
        I use the latest version HTSeq-0.5.1p2.

        Comment

        • jameslz
          Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 20

          #5
          Originally posted by jameslz View Post
          A more question:
          Tophat can't handle reads with different size of length ?
          if I trim the low quality base from the 3' end , I can map 80% paired reads to the reference, if not, just 70% paired reads can be mapped to genome.

          can anyone help me?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          40 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          46 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...