Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • novino11
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    #1

    experimental versus control enrichemnt for chip seq data

    Hi all
    I have done few chips using antibody against a transcription factor in honeybee. I also used pre immune IgG (from the animal where antibody was generated) and did chip in identical way. I have now used input as control and have found peaks in both the experimental chip data and the control (chip using pre immune IgG ) data.
    Some of the peaks found in experimental dataset are also turning up in control dataset. However, the fold enrichment differs- say if the experimental dataset shows an enrichment of 100 fold, the control dataset shows enrichment of 10 fold.
    To get the final data- should i subtract the control dataset from experimental in a quantitative manner or just qualitative way. I mean should I consider the fold enrichment while subtraction or should I just ignore it

    Thanks
    naveen
  • biznatch
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 124

    #2
    I don't think there's a perfectly agreed upon way to subtract input or IgG control from the experimental sample, I've tried looking for the same thing. If you just need to identify peaks, you can use various peak calling programs that take input into consideration using various algorithms when identifying them. Some peak calling programs. I don't know if they all consider input, I've only used SISSRS, which does.

    These are some previous threads discussing normalization to input:

    Any non-primary sequence heritable modification of genetic material. ChIP-SEQ, DNA methylation (Bisulfite-SEQ), chromatin modifications (methylation, acetylation, etc), non coding RNA.

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...