Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • novino11
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    experimental versus control enrichemnt for chip seq data

    Hi all
    I have done few chips using antibody against a transcription factor in honeybee. I also used pre immune IgG (from the animal where antibody was generated) and did chip in identical way. I have now used input as control and have found peaks in both the experimental chip data and the control (chip using pre immune IgG ) data.
    Some of the peaks found in experimental dataset are also turning up in control dataset. However, the fold enrichment differs- say if the experimental dataset shows an enrichment of 100 fold, the control dataset shows enrichment of 10 fold.
    To get the final data- should i subtract the control dataset from experimental in a quantitative manner or just qualitative way. I mean should I consider the fold enrichment while subtraction or should I just ignore it

    Thanks
    naveen
  • biznatch
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 124

    #2
    I don't think there's a perfectly agreed upon way to subtract input or IgG control from the experimental sample, I've tried looking for the same thing. If you just need to identify peaks, you can use various peak calling programs that take input into consideration using various algorithms when identifying them. Some peak calling programs. I don't know if they all consider input, I've only used SISSRS, which does.

    These are some previous threads discussing normalization to input:

    Any non-primary sequence heritable modification of genetic material. ChIP-SEQ, DNA methylation (Bisulfite-SEQ), chromatin modifications (methylation, acetylation, etc), non coding RNA.

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...