Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sbaheti
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 12

    #1

    tool to merge pileup

    hi

    I need to merge pileup from multiple samples, do we have an open source tool to merge multiple pileups.

    Thanks

    Saurabh
  • mgolo
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 10

    #2
    Hi!

    I have the same question Saurabh. I have 3 biological replicates and i would like to normalize them before i merge their pileup files. Does anyone have a clue for this?

    Thanks in advance!

    Maria

    Comment

    • gringer
      David Eccles (gringer)
      • May 2011
      • 845

      #3
      For a basic merge, 'samtools mpileup ' will do this:

      http://samtools.sourceforge.net/mpileup.shtml

      It displays different columns for each sample; I'm not sure if that is what you want.

      Comment

      • mgolo
        Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 10

        #4
        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        For a basic merge, 'samtools mpileup ' will do this:

        http://samtools.sourceforge.net/mpileup.shtml

        It displays different columns for each sample; I'm not sure if that is what you want.
        Hi! Thanks for your fast reply

        I don´t think this is what i need. I would like to merge 3 biological replicates' results into one single file. Basically for each count calculate the mean of the 3 runs. But before doing that i need to normalize somehow the 3 files, as they have different coverages. Maybe i have to do this before creating the pileup files... Any idea?

        Comment

        • gringer
          David Eccles (gringer)
          • May 2011
          • 845

          #5
          I don't think this is what i need. I would like to merge 3 biological replicates' results into one single file. Basically for each count calculate the mean of the 3 runs. But before doing that i need to normalize somehow the 3 files, as they have different coverages. Maybe i have to do this before creating the pileup files... Any idea?
          mpileup is the only hammer I know (I'm very new to this), so take this with a grain of salt....

          mpileup gives raw count data for each run, so you can extract those columns as your raw coverages per sample. I would then normalise by dividing by some statistic from the counts per column (e.g. 75th percentile). Here's a quick R script that does this:

          Code:
          # read in pileup data
          data.df <- read.delim("mpileup_lane1-6.csv", sep = "\t", header = FALSE,
                                col.names = c("isoform","pos","flag",paste(c("count","seq","qual"),rep(1:6,each=3),sep="_")));
          pos.counts <- cbind(isoform = data.df$isoform,pos = data.df$pos,data.df[,paste("count",1:6,sep="_")]);
          # rough normalisation of count data
          quantile.counts <- apply(pos.counts[,3:8],2,quantile, p=0.75);
          quantile.counts <- quantile.counts / min(quantile.counts);
          pos.counts[,3:8] <- t(t(pos.counts[,3:8]) / quantile.counts);
          pos.counts$mean <- apply(pos.counts[,3:8],1,mean);
          A more complex *PKM-style normalisation would need to take into account the transcript sizes for each hit, so you'd use something like cufflinks/DEseq/whatever to get *PKM values for each transcript, then divide by that value. I'm not sure if going that far would be necessary, given that they should be hitting transcripts with a similar relative frequency.

          Comment

          • mgolo
            Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 10

            #6
            Thank you gringer!

            I think you are right about the normalization, no need to take into account transcript sizes

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...