Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lspoor
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 18

    vcfutils.pl -specifying minimum read depth?



    Hi everyone, I was wondering if you might be able to help me with specifying a minimum read depth when calling consensus sequences?

    I'm running samtools-0.1.18 on Ubuntu 10.04. I have produced VCF files for all sites for my bacterial genome sequences (from BWA BAM files), which seem ok (based on using the following commandline: /samtools-0.1.18/samtools mpileup -E -q30 -Q30 -uf REF.fa isolate1.merged.bam | /samtools-0.1.18/bcftools/bcftools view -cg - > isolate1.all_sites.vcf), and am using the following command line in vcftools with the aim of specifying a minimum read depth of 3 when calling the genome consensus sequences:

    /samtools-0.1.18/bcfutils/vcfutils.pl vcf2fq -d3 AB10.all_sites_E_q30_Q30.vcf > AB10.all_sites_E_q30_Q30_RD3.fq (which I convert to FASTA using a python script).

    Whether or not I specify the option -d3 (I believe 3 is the default anyway) in the commandline, in all cases where the VCF file states that DP=1 or DP=2, rather than not calling the base, it calls a lowercase letter at these sites.

    Over the course of my genomes, this amounts to approximately 48 000 bases in each genome which have been called lowercase, which includes approximately 650 variant sites. If these variant sites are of poor quality and include potentially false positive SNPs, this may be adversely affecting my downstream phylogenetic analysis.

    My questions are:
    a) Does anyone know if this is normal for it to insert a lowercase base rather than calling 'n' at these sites (which is what I was incorrectly assuming it would do!)
    b) What are your opinions on whether I should just replace all of these sites with an 'n' to be on the conservative side?

    Any help is much appreciated, SeqAnswers has been so great at helping in the past!

    Best Wishes,

    Laura
  • wzhjlau2009
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 5

    #2
    how about your results finally ? i am doing the same process as your had done . i want to know may i have a chance to have a communication with you about this area.my email:[email protected] QQ:461739553
    best wishes,
    wisdom

    Comment

    • swbarnes2
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 910

      #3
      Here's the relevent part of the script:

      Options: -d INT minimum depth [$opts{d}]
      -D INT maximum depth [$opts{D}]
      -Q INT min RMS mapQ [$opts{Q}]
      -l INT INDEL filtering window [$opts{l}]
      my $_Q = $opts{Q};
      my $_d = $opts{d};
      my $_D = $opts{D};
      my %het = (AC=>'M', AG=>'R', AT=>'W', CA=>'M', CG=>'S', CT=>'Y',
      GA=>'R', GC=>'S', GT=>'K', TA=>'W', TC=>'Y', TG=>'K')

      ...

      my ($ref, $alt) = ($t[3], $1);
      my ($b, $q);
      $q = $1 if ($t[7] =~ /FQ=(-?[\d\.]+)/);
      if ($q < 0) {
      $_ = ($t[7] =~ /AF1=([\d\.]+)/)? $1 : 0;
      $b = ($_ < .5 || $alt eq '.')? $ref : $alt;
      $q = -$q;
      } else {
      $b = $het{"$ref$alt"};
      $b ||= 'N';
      }
      $b = lc($b);
      $b = uc($b) if (($t[7] =~ /MQ=(\d+)/ && $1 >= $_Q) && ($t[7] =~ /DP=(\d+)/ && $1 >= $_d && $1 <= $_D));
      So basically, the only way an N gets put in is if the FQ is < 0 (which happens when your SNP is mixed), and there's no single letter code for that mix.

      Otherwise, it will be lowercase unless the MQ and DP are within the ranges you set in the options, in which case, it's uppercase.

      Comment

      • ymwur
        Member
        • Nov 2012
        • 11

        #4
        Hi,
        So, I am wodnering what does a N in the concesus generated by mpileup measns?
        I am still confused about when FQ can be samller than 0? I am not sure what does mixed SNP mean?
        Does a N mean there is no read mapped to that particular site (if the bam is resulted by BWA mapping)?

        Thans,

        Chih-Ming

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        5 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        50 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        110 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...