Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Azazel
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 52

    #1

    [DESeq] versions, conds definition, estimateDispersions vs estimateVarianceFunctions

    1.) On a fresh install of R 2.13.2 (Win 7), I am trying to install the current version of DESeq from http://bioconductor.org/packages/dev...tml/DESeq.html.

    According to that page, the version to be installed should be version 1.5.35.

    However when I install it with these commands:

    source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R")
    biocLite("DESeq")


    and then check the installed version (installed.packages()[,c("Package","Version")]) I get:
    DESeq "DESeq" "1.4.1"

    2.) In the manual I noticed that there seems to be a new function, called "estimateDispersions" which seems to be similar to what was previously "estimateVarianceFunctions". I am referring to the manual PDF dated "October 29, 2011". However this new function does not seem to exist in my installation (this could be related to the above point of it being version 1.4.1):

    > cds <- estimateDispersions(cds, method="blind", sharingMode="fit-only")
    Error: could not find function "estimateDispersions"


    3.) I have written a couple of scripts that contain calls to "estimateVarianceFunctions" - will they still work with future versions of DESeq?

    4.) One thing I noted about the conds vector. Prevously (manual from "April 21, 2011") it was defined like this:

    conds <- c( "T", "T", "T", "Tb", "N", "N" )

    But now it's defined like this:

    conds <- factor( c( "treated", "treated", "untreated", "untreated" ) )

    So previously it was a vector and now it is a factor. Again, I wonder if old scripts need to be changed?
  • DanR
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 1

    #2
    Hi,

    1)
    The session info from the vignette shows Anders is running R2.14.0 not R2.13.2 which you installed. The version of DESeq are different too (Anders: 1.5.35, you are running 1.4.1).
    I think you may need to upgrade the version of R and bioconductor before your default repository points to the newest version of DESeq.

    2) If the functions are new, you would not find "estimateDispersions" in an old version.

    4) I think the factor just informs R that the vector has variables that are factors == like "normal" and "cancer"

    Dan

    Comment

    • Simon Anders
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 995

      #3
      1) The biocLite script ties Bioconductor version to R versions, i.e., depending on your R version it downloads different package version; specifically, for R 2.13, it pulls from Bioc 2.8 and for R 2.14 (just released) it pulls from Bioc 2.9 (currently 'deve', will be release in a few days). Sometimes you can circumvent that by installing a package manually but this might require that you do the same with the packages it depends on.

      3) No, sorry. You need to change the command in your scripts.

      4) Non-factors get automatically converted to factors by 'newCountDataSet' so it does not matter.

      Comment

      • marcowanger
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2008
        • 273

        #4
        Originally posted by Simon Anders View Post
        1) The biocLite script ties Bioconductor version to R versions, i.e., depending on your R version it downloads different package version; specifically, for R 2.13, it pulls from Bioc 2.8 and for R 2.14 (just released) it pulls from Bioc 2.9 (currently 'deve', will be release in a few days). Sometimes you can circumvent that by installing a package manually but this might require that you do the same with the packages it depends on.

        3) No, sorry. You need to change the command in your scripts.

        4) Non-factors get automatically converted to factors by 'newCountDataSet' so it does not matter.
        Is there any change-log for each version of DESeq? I was working with 1.2.1 and now the release is 1.6.0.
        Marco

        Comment

        • marcowanger
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2008
          • 273

          #5
          I found it here

          Marco

          Comment

          • Simon Anders
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 995

            #6
            Originally posted by marcowanger View Post
            Right. Also note the new section at the end of the vignette summerizing differences between the current DESeq version and the method described in the paper.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
              by SEQadmin2



              CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

              Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
              ...
              07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
            0 responses
            32 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
            0 responses
            50 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...