Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cw11
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 12

    CuffDiff 0 FPKM Output/Incorrectly Identified Differential Expression?

    I’m having some problems with CuffDiff – or rather, the output I am getting is completely baffling to me. I believe the program is incorrectly identifying genes as differentially expressed due to an error.

    I have three conditions that I am testing – we’ll call them GG, AG, and AA. For Condition GG, I have 2 samples, for Condition AG, I have 3 samples, and for Condition AA, I have 5 samples. When I run CuffDiff, I get a list of differentially expressed genes with q-values less than 0.05. However, when I actually examine the FPKMs for my genes, I see results like this:

    GG: 0 (OK)
    AG: 11.6888 (OK)
    AA: 10.7249 (OK)

    In this instance, CuffDiff reported GG as being differentially expressed relative to AG, and GG as being differentially expressed relative to AA.

    Viewing my reads in IGV, however, I see MANY reads for this gene in ALL conditions and samples. I cannot understand why my FPKMs are 0. I have also calculated the RPKM values for this gene’s transcripts using SeqGene, as a “quality control” of sorts. When I do this, all RPKMs for this gene are > 1; a representative transcript has RPKM values like this:

    GG: 2.31, 2.04
    AG: 2.63, 2.59, 2.5
    AA: 2.32, 2.15, 2.42, 2.33, 3.02

    For my pipeline, I am usingTophat to map reads and find splice junctions, followed by Cufflinks to find novel transcripts, CuffMerge to merge these novel transcripts together with a reference genome as guide, and CuffDiff to identify differences in transcript expression. For reference, here is a summary of the calls I’ve made (from most to least recent).

    CuffDiff:
    Code:
    bsub -P Lithium -q iweek -R rusage[mem=8] -R span[hosts=1] -n 4 -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/07_CuffDiff_10.19.2011_01/output.txt cuffdiff -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/07_CuffDiff_10.19.2011_01 -p 12 -L AG,GG,AA /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/06_CuffMerge_10.19.2011_02/merged.gtf /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_TGTGTG_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_GAGAGA_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACAC_1/accepted_hits.bam /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_CTCTCT_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_TGTGGA_1/accepted_hits.bam /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_GAGAAC_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACCT_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_CTCTTG_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_CTTGTG_1/accepted_hits.bam,/psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_TGGAGA_1/accepted_hits.bam
    CuffMerge:
    Code:
    cuffmerge -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/06_CuffMerge_10.19.2011_02 -g /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf -s /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Sequence/WholeGenomeFasta/genome.fa /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/02_DeMultiplexingCode/F_02_FileForTestMerging.txt
    Where FileForTestMerging looked like this:
    Code:
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACAC_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACCT_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_CTCTCT_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_CTCTTG_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_CTTGTG_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_GAGAAC_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_GAGAGA_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_TGGAGA_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_TGTGGA_1/transcripts.gtf
    /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_TGTGTG_1/transcripts.gtf
    Cufflinks:
    Code:
    bsub -P Lithium -q iweek -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACAC_1/output.txt cufflinks -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/04_Cufflinks_10.18.2011_09/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACAC_1 -g /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_ACACAC_1/accepted_hits.bam
    Tophat (one of 10 calls):
    Code:
    bsub -P Lithium -q iweek -R rusage[mem=8] -R span[hosts=1] -n 4 -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_CTTGTG_1.txt tophat -o /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/01_RNASeq_Analysis/03_TophatTest_10.12.2011_11/FastQDemultiplexed_CTTGTG_1 -p 4 -a 5 -F 0.0 -r 100 --segment-length 20 /psych/neuro/people/wright/Project_3_RNASeq/hg19-male /psych/inf/cwright/05_DemultiplexedFastQFiles/FastQDemultiplexed_CTTGTG_1.fq /psych/inf/cwright/05_DemultiplexedFastQFiles/FastQDemultiplexed_CTTGTG_2.fq
    Any thoughts, help, comments on the CuffDiff output (or suggestions on the pipeline, for that matter) would be greatly appreciated!
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #2
    Does your gene have another isoform that could be taking all the reads? Cufflinks considers isoform abundance in its FPKM calculations, so that might have something to do about it.

    Comment

    • lmf_bill
      Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 36

      #3
      I got the similar problems. For some genes without isoforms, cufflinks or cuffdiff estimate 0 FPKM, but the real case is they are expressed high.

      Comment

      • cw11
        Member
        • Sep 2011
        • 12

        #4
        Thanks! What has everyone doing to deal with these false positives? Just filtering out genes which have FPKMs of 0 for one of the conditions?

        (I also understand from a different thread - http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14864 - that the tuxedo group is planning to address some of these issues in their upcoming version 1.2.0... anyone know when this is expected to come out?)

        Comment

        • pengchy
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 116

          #5
          The problem still exist for cufflinks version 2.2.1. I checked One example that one gene without any reads hit, be reported FPKM 0. However, not all genes without any reads hit were reported. How to explain?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          39 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...