Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Andrea Apolloni
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 2

    #1

    DESeq without biological replicates (dataset: Marioni et al.)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to use DESeq (version 1.6.1) for differential analysis of the dataset of Marioni et al.
    This dataset contains the counts of 32000 genes sequenced from liver and kidney cells of only one patient. For each condition (liver and kidney), the authors sequenced the samples on different lanes of the machine. This results in replication techniques, but not biological replicates.

    Following the directions of the vignette, I summed the counts of technical replicates of liver and kidney. So, now I have a sample for kidney and a sample for liver, for each gene.

    I'm trying to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind" and sharingMode="fit-only".
    By doing so I get a warning: "In parametricDispersionFit(means, disps) : Dispersion fit did not converge."
    If I try to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind", sharingMode="fit-only" and also fitType="local", the warning disappears.

    Is this a correct choice of parameters, with this dataset?

    Thanks
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    Yes, even though the results will still not be very meaningful.

    Comment

    • Andrea Apolloni
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks for the clarification, Simon.

      So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?

      My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
      You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?

      Comment

      • Simon Anders
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 995

        #4
        Originally posted by Andrea Apolloni View Post
        So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?
        Yes. This is what the warning recommends, and, actually, I am not even sure yet which fit type I'd prefer.

        My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
        You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?
        Exactly.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...