Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swaraj
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 50

    #1

    summarizeOverlaps vs countOverlaps

    Dear All,

    I am getting completely different results for the count of mapped reads on transcript features using the countOverlaps and summarizeOverlaps.

    CountOverlaps on using a gappedAlignment and Granges object gives slightly different results. SummarizeOverlaps gives totally different results for the modes "Union" and "intersectionNotEmpty".

    Can someone please let me know where I am making a mistake. I have attached a screenshot of the transcripts. All the transcripts belong to the same gene.

    Following steps were performed by me on a small subset of my data

    1. I built a gapped alignment object of mapped reads using the command
    reads=readBamGappedAlignments("path / to / bam/sorted.bam")

    2. From the gapped alignment I built a genomic ranges object
    ranges=GRanges(seqnames=rname(reads),
    ranges=IRanges(start=start(reads),
    end=end(reads)),strand=rep("*",length(reads)))

    3. I built a genomic ranges list from a custom genedb object (4 transcripts).
    geneE=exonsBy(genedb,'gene')

    4. Used the count and summarize overlaps functions
    a). count1=countOverlaps(geneE, reads)
    b). count2=countOverlaps(geneE, ranges)
    c). count3=assays(summarizeOverlaps(geneE, reads,
    mode="UNION"))$counts[,1]
    c). count4=assays(summarizeOverlaps(geneE, reads,
    mode="intersectionNotEmpty"))$counts[,1]

    5. I get four different count results
    "T1, T2, T3, T4"
    a). count1 "55972, 41029, 18270, 18734"
    b). count2 "55989, 41046, 18287, 18751"
    c). count3 "0, 2, 0, 1092"
    d). count4 "0, 3712, 0, 2550"
    Attached Files

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
    by SEQadmin2



    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
    ...
    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
    by SEQadmin2


    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
    ...
    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 12:22 PM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
0 responses
50 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...