Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xiangq
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 11

    #16
    Hi billstevens,

    I only use Ensemble GTF file as annotation and have no idea of other annotation files.
    But based on my experience, the cuffdiff will output features using the ID in the annotation file if you give it the GTF file (which is the annotation file and not generated by cuffcompare or cuffmerge).
    The output features are all annotated in the GTF, so no novel gene or transcript can be found.
    Thanks.

    -xiangq

    Comment

    • xiangq
      Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 11

      #17
      Thanks for sdriscoll's clarification. It helps.

      Comment

      • xiangq
        Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 11

        #18
        As for the CDS output, I double check the data. It seems that the cuffdiff will not output CDS of genes which generate both protein and other non-protein coding RNA.
        Anyone can give the reason? Thanks.

        Comment

        • sdriscoll
          I like code
          • Sep 2009
          • 436

          #19
          I haven't noticed this myself however I haven't paid much attention to the CDS output aside from noting that the file usually has almost as many rows as the gene_exp.diff file.
          /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
          Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

          Comment

          • billstevens
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2012
            • 120

            #20
            Originally posted by billstevens View Post
            So I"m very confused on this GTF format.

            From the UCSC wiki, it states "At this time, this genePredToGtf command can provide better GTF files than available from the table browser."
            http://genomewiki.ucsc.edu/index.php..._or_gff_format

            However, I get outputs from cuffdiff in UNIPROT, RefSeq, UCSC and ENSEMBLE. So that's not a huge deal, I can use DAVID to get all of them. What I am really confused by is this:

            One of my CDS is uc010nxq.1. When I search for this on Google, I get this and this

            One of these is on chromosome 15 and the other on chromosome X. Please help, I could not be more confused.
            Wow, thanks a lot!

            I guess we should all be careful when using DAVID then, because it just lets you pick the species, not which genes.

            Comment

            • sdriscoll
              I like code
              • Sep 2009
              • 436

              #21
              That's why, when I use DAVID, I select OFFICIAL_GENE_SYMBOL as the identifier type for my gene list. To do that I have to have everything in terms of those gene symbols so that's why I've made a point to make sure to get those symbols into the GTF files I use for expression quantification.
              /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
              Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              38 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...