Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • owenman
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 4

    bowtie2 minimum score threshold

    I am using bowtie2 version 2.0.0-beta7

    A careful reading of the bowtie2 manual section for local alignments makes it sounds like the best score you can possibly get is 2 times the read length:

    "A base that matches receives a bonus of +2 by default."

    "The best possible score in local mode equals the match bonus times the length of the read."

    But the very next paragraph says:

    "In local alignment mdoe, the default minimum score threshold is 20 + 8.0 * ln(L), where L is the read length."

    This seems contradictory: If a perfect match receives a score of 2 times the read length, how can you ever get a score that is 20 plus 8 times the length?

    Am I missing something?
  • nickloman
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 355

    #2
    My reading is that it's 20 + 8 * the natural log of the read length.

    Comment

    • owenman
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 4

      #3
      Ah, right. I guess my "careful reading" wasn't careful enough.

      I wasn't expecting a natural log - I was reading ln(L) as "the length of read L".

      It's clear now that you point it out. And I also missed the section on writing formulas farther down in the manual: "The available function types are constant (C), linear (L), square-root (S), and natural log (G)." How embarrassing!

      Thank you, nickloman, for your reply.

      Comment

      • cam.jack
        Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 11

        #4
        The first paragraph you read is for end-to-end alignment and the 2nd is for local alignment. They are different methods with different scoring systems.

        Comment

        • joseph
          Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 39

          #5
          --score-min bowitie2

          Hi
          I am using bowtie2.0.0-beta7 in --local mode to align SE 50 bases reads; I would like to change the parameter --score-min (default in --local mode is G,20,8) to increase the alignment score. Any suggestions?
          Thank you,
          Joseph Dhahbi

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          22 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...