Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • litali
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 78

    clc or dnastar

    Hi,
    Which software is more recommended for NGS analysis, array analysis, probes and primers etc, CLC or DNASTAR?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You can get trial licenses for most commercial software that should help you make an informed purchasing decision after you have had a chance to try the software out first-hand.

    Comment

    • NextGenSeq
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 482

      #3
      CLC is far superior, particularly the new 5.5 version

      Comment

      • Starcross
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 2

        #4
        You also might want to look at Partek for NGS and microarray analysis. I've used it for a few years for both types of analysis.

        Comment

        • DFJ111
          Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 20

          #5
          Personally I found CLC pretty but glitchy and too expensive. Unbelievably they had no facility to annotate with a .gff file except as a plugin. Did one lineup where an A and a C were considered to be 100% identical (yes, I submitted a bug report). Perhaps the new version is better? but my experience was not good. I prefer geneious, but I have to admit bias here since I'm in the same department as the devs.

          Comment

          • DNASTAR
            Registered Vendor
            • Aug 2010
            • 48

            #6
            Obviously, I'm biased to DNASTAR, but some objective comparisons between the two (as well as other products) can be found in the following two articles recently published in BMC Genomics.

            Kumar and Blaxter: Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data. BMC Genomics 2010 11:571.

            Feldmeyer et al.: Short read Illumina data for the de novo assembly of a non-model snail species transcriptome (Radix balthica, Basommatophora, Pulmonata), and a comparison of assembler performance. BMC Genomics 2011 12:317.

            Both studies compared DNASTAR's SeqMan NGen with other products in performing a de novo transcriptome assembly – one study used 454 data; the other study used Illumina data - and both concluded that SeqMan NGen is the best software for performing de novo transcriptome assemblies.

            Feel free to give us a call or email if you have questions as you continue to look for software. We have a next-gen scientist dedicated to assisting with any questions you may have.

            Phone: 608-258-7420
            Toll Free in the U.S. and Canada: 866-511-5090
            [email protected]

            Thanks,
            Anne

            Comment

            • sklages
              Senior Member
              • May 2008
              • 628

              #7
              Originally posted by litali View Post
              Hi,
              Which software is more recommended for NGS analysis, array analysis, probes and primers etc, CLC or DNASTAR?
              I'd go with GenoMax.

              Give it a try yourself. If you are just asking without having some more details in mind, it is hard to tell what is best for your purpose. Keep in mind that CLC is not a transcriptome assembler, but a genome assembler and mapper ..

              cheers,
              Sven

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...