Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • litali
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 78

    #1

    clc or dnastar

    Hi,
    Which software is more recommended for NGS analysis, array analysis, probes and primers etc, CLC or DNASTAR?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You can get trial licenses for most commercial software that should help you make an informed purchasing decision after you have had a chance to try the software out first-hand.

    Comment

    • NextGenSeq
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 482

      #3
      CLC is far superior, particularly the new 5.5 version

      Comment

      • Starcross
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 2

        #4
        You also might want to look at Partek for NGS and microarray analysis. I've used it for a few years for both types of analysis.

        Comment

        • DFJ111
          Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 20

          #5
          Personally I found CLC pretty but glitchy and too expensive. Unbelievably they had no facility to annotate with a .gff file except as a plugin. Did one lineup where an A and a C were considered to be 100% identical (yes, I submitted a bug report). Perhaps the new version is better? but my experience was not good. I prefer geneious, but I have to admit bias here since I'm in the same department as the devs.

          Comment

          • DNASTAR
            Registered Vendor
            • Aug 2010
            • 48

            #6
            Obviously, I'm biased to DNASTAR, but some objective comparisons between the two (as well as other products) can be found in the following two articles recently published in BMC Genomics.

            Kumar and Blaxter: Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data. BMC Genomics 2010 11:571.

            Feldmeyer et al.: Short read Illumina data for the de novo assembly of a non-model snail species transcriptome (Radix balthica, Basommatophora, Pulmonata), and a comparison of assembler performance. BMC Genomics 2011 12:317.

            Both studies compared DNASTAR's SeqMan NGen with other products in performing a de novo transcriptome assembly – one study used 454 data; the other study used Illumina data - and both concluded that SeqMan NGen is the best software for performing de novo transcriptome assemblies.

            Feel free to give us a call or email if you have questions as you continue to look for software. We have a next-gen scientist dedicated to assisting with any questions you may have.

            Phone: 608-258-7420
            Toll Free in the U.S. and Canada: 866-511-5090
            [email protected]

            Thanks,
            Anne

            Comment

            • sklages
              Senior Member
              • May 2008
              • 628

              #7
              Originally posted by litali View Post
              Hi,
              Which software is more recommended for NGS analysis, array analysis, probes and primers etc, CLC or DNASTAR?
              I'd go with GenoMax.

              Give it a try yourself. If you are just asking without having some more details in mind, it is hard to tell what is best for your purpose. Keep in mind that CLC is not a transcriptome assembler, but a genome assembler and mapper ..

              cheers,
              Sven

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                Yesterday, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...