Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • litali
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 78

    #1

    clc or dnastar

    Hi,
    Which software is more recommended for NGS analysis, array analysis, probes and primers etc, CLC or DNASTAR?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You can get trial licenses for most commercial software that should help you make an informed purchasing decision after you have had a chance to try the software out first-hand.

    Comment

    • NextGenSeq
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 482

      #3
      CLC is far superior, particularly the new 5.5 version

      Comment

      • Starcross
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 2

        #4
        You also might want to look at Partek for NGS and microarray analysis. I've used it for a few years for both types of analysis.

        Comment

        • DFJ111
          Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 20

          #5
          Personally I found CLC pretty but glitchy and too expensive. Unbelievably they had no facility to annotate with a .gff file except as a plugin. Did one lineup where an A and a C were considered to be 100% identical (yes, I submitted a bug report). Perhaps the new version is better? but my experience was not good. I prefer geneious, but I have to admit bias here since I'm in the same department as the devs.

          Comment

          • DNASTAR
            Registered Vendor
            • Aug 2010
            • 48

            #6
            Obviously, I'm biased to DNASTAR, but some objective comparisons between the two (as well as other products) can be found in the following two articles recently published in BMC Genomics.

            Kumar and Blaxter: Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data. BMC Genomics 2010 11:571.

            Feldmeyer et al.: Short read Illumina data for the de novo assembly of a non-model snail species transcriptome (Radix balthica, Basommatophora, Pulmonata), and a comparison of assembler performance. BMC Genomics 2011 12:317.

            Both studies compared DNASTAR's SeqMan NGen with other products in performing a de novo transcriptome assembly – one study used 454 data; the other study used Illumina data - and both concluded that SeqMan NGen is the best software for performing de novo transcriptome assemblies.

            Feel free to give us a call or email if you have questions as you continue to look for software. We have a next-gen scientist dedicated to assisting with any questions you may have.

            Phone: 608-258-7420
            Toll Free in the U.S. and Canada: 866-511-5090
            [email protected]

            Thanks,
            Anne

            Comment

            • sklages
              Senior Member
              • May 2008
              • 628

              #7
              Originally posted by litali View Post
              Hi,
              Which software is more recommended for NGS analysis, array analysis, probes and primers etc, CLC or DNASTAR?
              I'd go with GenoMax.

              Give it a try yourself. If you are just asking without having some more details in mind, it is hard to tell what is best for your purpose. Keep in mind that CLC is not a transcriptome assembler, but a genome assembler and mapper ..

              cheers,
              Sven

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:05 AM
              0 responses
              5 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
              0 responses
              24 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              38 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...