Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mortonm33
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 3

    Soft-clipped alignments - keep or filter out?

    I have question regarding the post-processing of RNA-Seq data. I'm using GSNAP version 07-03 for alignment of paired-end data and am getting a lot of soft-clipped alignments (>20% of reads). I'm wondering if it would be better to keep or remove these alignments before further processing, such as differential expression analysis. I ran my analysis before removing the soft-clipped alignments and validated one of the differentially expressed transcripts with qPCR, but then was told by a colleague that I should remove soft-clipped alignments as they don't represent real alignments. After filtering out the soft-clipped alignments, the transcript I validated with PCR (and several others originally present in the differential expression results) no longer shows up as differentially expressed in my analysis of the RNA-Seq data. Any advice is appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Matt
  • DZhang
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 177

    #2
    Matt,

    Run your data through FastQC to examine the quality score distribution along the read length. If you see a sharp drop at the last few bps, you may clip those few bps before mapping.

    Best regards,
    Douglas

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...