Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • husamia
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 66

    #16
    I have seen duplicate percentage of 33% in targeted high coverage experiment and based on my assessment of false positive and false negative I am happy not removing duplicates.

    Comment

    • Michael.James.Clark
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 207

      #17
      Originally posted by husamia View Post
      I have seen duplicate percentage of 33% in targeted high coverage experiment and based on my assessment of false positive and false negative I am happy not removing duplicates.
      It depends on what your experiment is. In some cases it has very little effect, in some it can be detrimental. In no case that I've heard of does leaving PCR duplicates in your data improve your results, however.
      Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
      Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
      Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]

      Comment

      • panos_ed
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 11

        #18
        Originally posted by lh3 View Post
        It is possible to dedup before mapping. You may hash the first 14bp of each end and discard a pair if the 14+14bp coincides another pair. This method is not as good as deduping after mapping, but should be good enough. On the other hand, I do not think deduping is quite necessary for assembly.
        Why 14bp? Why not something else?

        Comment

        • transforu
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2014
          • 5

          #19
          Hi. everybody
          I have a problem about remove duplicates,
          In this study , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?study=ERP000603
          It's have 2 Experiments, and 13 RUNs,
          How to do remove duplicates? by study? by Experiments? or by one runs?
          Thanks !!

          Comment

          • sarvidsson
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2015
            • 137

            #20
            Remove PCR duplicates by library (and this looks like one big "library" mixed from 4 PCR pools). Optical duplicates are removed by lane (but I guess Picard would detect the within lane reads, given proper read group labelling).

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
              by SEQadmin2



              CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

              Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
              ...
              07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...