Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wzhangvv
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 10

    #1

    Help! about GATK realignment speed

    Hi All,
    I try to do SNP calling using GATK. This is my first time to do such things and I generated the work flow as follows. Everything went well till I was blocked by RealignerTargetCreator. It seemed to cost 15 days per sample! I don't know whether it was a normal speed with 300MB reference and 1GB bam file or not. Could anybody help me figure it out? I have 80 samples and obviously I don't have enough time to run this step.
    Thanks for your time~!

    My work flow (till RealignTargetCreator):
    I used sga to do de novo assembly and I used the output file contigs.fa as reference.

    bwa index -P contigs.fa -a bwtsw contigs.fa

    bwa aln -t 4 contigs.fa R1.fq > R1.sai

    bwa aln -t 4 contigs.fa R2.fq > R2.sai

    bwa sampe contigs.fa R1.sai R2.sai R1.fq R2.fq > A.sam

    samtools view -bST contigs.fa -o A_noRG.bam A.sam

    java -Xmx20g -XX:PermSize=10g -XX:MaxPermSize=10g -jar /usr/share/picard/lib/AddOrReplaceReadGroups.jar INPUT=A_noRG.bam OUTPUT=A_std.bam SORT_ORDER=coordinate RGID=lib1_A RGLB=AA RGPL=illumina RGSM=lib1_A RGPU=none VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT

    java -Xmx20g -XX:PermSize=10g -XX:MaxPermSize=10g -jar /usr/share/picard/lib/MarkDuplicates.jar INPUT=A_std.bam OUTPUT=A_std_noduplicates.bam METRICS_FILE=A_std.duplicate_matrics REMOVE_DUPLICATES=true ASSUME_SORTED=true VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT

    java -Xmx20g -XX:PermSize=10g -XX:MaxPermSize=10g -jar /usr/share/picard/lib/BuildBamIndex.jar INPUT=A_std_noduplicates.bam VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT

    java -Xmx20g -XX:PermSize=10g -XX:MaxPermSize=10g -jar /usr/share/GenomeAnalysisTK-2.1-10-gdbc86ec/GenomeAnalysisTK.jar -T RealignerTargetCreator -nt 8 -I A_std_noduplicates.bam -R contigs.fa -o A_forIndelAligner.intervals
  • adaptivegenome
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2009
    • 436

    #2
    Try OpenGE for realignment:

    Comment

    • wzhangvv
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 10

      #3
      Hi,

      Thanks for your reply!

      I just read the menu of OpenGE. It can't help me because its localrealign step requires the intervals file which need to be generated by GATK RealignerTargetCreator, which was the very slow step I mentioned before.

      Do you think my RealignerTargetCreator speed is normal (~10+ days per sample)? If it really is, I have to change my strategy.




      Originally posted by adaptivegenome View Post
      Try OpenGE for realignment:

      www.github.com/adaptivegenome/OpenGE

      Comment

      • qtrinh
        Member
        • May 2008
        • 20

        #4
        Hi,
        What about running RealignerTargetCreator in parallel on each of the chromosomes ? This should speed things up for you.

        Q

        Comment

        • wzhangvv
          Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 10

          #5
          Hi,
          Thanks for your reply!
          I just did de novo assembly and got millions of contigs without any chromosome info... The frog species I worked on doesn't have an assembled genome...
          I tried to get more scaffolds, but it was difficult to my rad data.

          Originally posted by qtrinh View Post
          Hi,
          What about running RealignerTargetCreator in parallel on each of the chromosomes ? This should speed things up for you.

          Q

          Comment

          • adaptivegenome
            Super Moderator
            • Nov 2009
            • 436

            #6
            I'm surprised that TargetCreator is the limiting step. Typically runs quite fast.

            Comment

            • wzhangvv
              Member
              • Oct 2012
              • 10

              #7
              Hi,
              Do you think there is anything wrong in my workflow? Can you give me some advice? I really don't know how to improve and debug it because the previous steps finished smoothly.
              Really appreciate your reply!

              Originally posted by adaptivegenome View Post
              I'm surprised that TargetCreator is the limiting step. Typically runs quite fast.

              Comment

              • Zaag
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 112

                #8
                use targeted regions so it doesn't walk over the entire genome (unless it's whole genome data)
                Last edited by Zaag; 10-14-2012, 06:10 AM.

                Comment

                • wzhangvv
                  Member
                  • Oct 2012
                  • 10

                  #9
                  Hi,
                  This is the whole genome data and I don't know the exact targeted regions...So I can't start with a known VCF file.
                  Thanks for your reply!



                  Originally posted by Zaag View Post
                  use targeted regions so it doesn't walk over the entire genome (unless it's whole genome data)

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                    ...
                    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                    ...
                    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                  0 responses
                  18 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                  0 responses
                  26 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                  0 responses
                  22 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                  0 responses
                  28 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...