Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shuang
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 100

    fastq_quality_trimmer error

    I'm having problems in running commands of fastx tool. For example, when I ran fastx_trimmer,
    fastx_trimmer -i in.txt -o out.fastq

    I received this error
    fastx_trimmer: Invalid quality score value (char '#' ord 35 quality value -29) on line 4

    Even I tried to add "-Q 64", still the same error.
    fastx_trimmer -i in.txt -Q 64 -o out.fastq


    Why is that??
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    If your data is in sanger format then -Q 33 would be the option to add.

    Comment

    • shuang
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 100

      #3
      Sorry, I forgot to mention my sample is Illumina. The sample length is 17kb.

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        Originally posted by shuang View Post
        I'm having problems in running commands of fastx tool. For example, when I ran fastx_trimmer,
        fastx_trimmer -i in.txt -o out.fastq

        I received this error
        fastx_trimmer: Invalid quality score value (char '#' ord 35 quality value -29) on line 4

        Even I tried to add "-Q 64", still the same error.
        fastx_trimmer -i in.txt -Q 64 -o out.fastq


        Why is that??
        Illumina stopped using the Phred+64 offset sometime ago; they now use Phred+33. The fastx toolkit assumes Phred+64 by default so your two examples were exactly the same. As GenoMax said you need to use -Q33.

        Comment

        • shuang
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 100

          #5
          When I use -Q 33, it didn't go much further, neither. Below is the command and the error message.
          fastx_trimmer -i in.txt -Q 33 -o all.fastq


          fastx_trimmer: Error: invalid quality score data on line 448 (quality_tok = "??????B?D?DDDBB?FFFF;FFBB>FFHHDD?EGH>EFEAECEDHHHHHGHFE:FDGA-CEDHHDBF>AAACF=AAEBGFGF?CDDEHH+=CCCCBDAFF?DF.6BFF66...=B<*645,,5A,5,,53>?;>A,A5==*..8A?*:C"

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            shuang: Can you tell us what OS you are using to run the fastx_trimmer?

            Did you open/edit the sequence file ("in.txt") in a non-unix OS (e.g. windows/OS X)?

            What do you mean by sample length is 17kb?

            Comment

            • shuang
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2011
              • 100

              #7
              I use Ubuntu. The in.txt is a fastq file, which was downloaded directly from the sequencing facility website.

              17kb is the expected fully assembled length.

              Comment

              • dGho
                Member
                • Jan 2013
                • 43

                #8
                same problem

                I am using fastq_quality_ trimmer for the first time and I am having this same problem also on Illumina generated data. Does anyone know what the solution to this is?

                Comment

                • JackieBadger
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 385

                  #9
                  Just use TRIMMOMATIC.
                  Works better with more options

                  Comment

                  • TonyBrooks
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 303

                    #10
                    There should be no space between the Q and the 33.

                    You also need to specify how you want to trim by setting variables for -f and -l e.g.

                    fastx_trimmer -Q33 -f 1 -l 50 -i input.fastq -o output.fastq

                    AFAIK Fastq's also need to be uncompressed for input but can be compressed on output using the -z flag.

                    Use fastx_trimmer -h for help

                    Comment

                    • yifangt
                      Member
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 61

                      #11
                      I had the exactly same problem! It seems the problem is more of -Q33 option as I tried it.
                      Two things here:

                      1) which is the wrong quality score, i.e. ASCII char when you have the -Q33 on?

                      2) our sequence machine was run with the MS-Windows platform and the data was deposited on Linux storage disk. There might be a issue with this cross platform situation, but how to solve it?

                      Thanks a lot!

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                        ...
                        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                        ...
                        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                      0 responses
                      26 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
                      0 responses
                      20 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
                      0 responses
                      28 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                      0 responses
                      38 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...