Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ugolino
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 14

    advice on DESeq and EdgeR output from bacterial RNA-seq

    Hi there,

    I'm analyzing RNA-seq data from a bacterial monoculture exposed to 4 conditions. There are 3 bioreps for each condition and after aligning to reference using bowtie2, getting read counts with htseq (eliminated rRNA), I used both DESeq and edgeR (with TMM) to infer DE or genes. I hope the table below is clear. Column 2 and 3 are DESeq, 4 and 5 edgeR and col 6 is the overlap. FDR with BH correction, FC is fold change. EdgeR detects all the genes that DESeq detects as DE, and appreciably more. I'm really struggling to decide whether to accept only the overlap between the two, or give a chance to the genes additionally detected by edgeR. Recent literature implies slightly higher false pos rate for edgeR at n=3; on the other hand DESeq is sometimes qualified as over-conservative. But I'm no statistician, I'm a biologist and would much appreciate your insight.

    thanks!

    DESeq edgeR
    comparison FDR 5% FC>2 FDR 5% FC>2 overlap
    A:B 599 467 896 604 599
    A:C 0 0 na
    A 550 400 879 573 548
    B:C 676 523 972 640 676
    B 0 0 na
    C 623 443 879 559 622


    comparison of RNA-seq methods



    During the last 3 years, a number of approaches for the normalization of RNA sequencing data have emerged in the literature, differing both in the type of bias adjustment and in the statistical strategy adopted. However, as data continue to accumulate, there has been no clear consensus on the approp …
  • ugolino
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 14

    #2
    here is the table again

    DESeq edgeR
    comparison FDR 5% FC>2 FDR 5% FC>2 overlap
    A/B 599 467 896 604 599
    A/C 0 0 na
    A/D 550 400 879 573 548
    B/C 676 523 972 640 676
    B/D 0 0 na
    C/D 623 443 879 559 622

    Comment

    • ugolino
      Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 14

      #3
      Is my post poorly formulated or simply inane? I wonder why is it being ignored?

      thanks

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
        by seqadmin




        The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
        03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
      • seqadmin
        New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
        by seqadmin


        This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

        The Headliner
        The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
        03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
      0 responses
      41 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
      0 responses
      49 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
      0 responses
      192 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...